On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for spelling, grammar and
technical correctness.
The latest committed version is online at:
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 12:32 -0800, Bob Kashani wrote:
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 14:05 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 01:29 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 13:35 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Could we do a meeting this week?
Yes. We need to get on it.
What day and time is good for people?
I'm at UTC+8, so UTC 18:00-23:00 is a little bit crap for me, but I can
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 21:47 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
(((BTW, is it possible that we have no banner yet?)))
On 3/9/07, Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this the final text from the marketing team?
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointSeventeen/ReleaseNotes/Draft
Friday evening so yes
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 17:04 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
In that area, you have (correct me if I'm wrong) the following major cities:
Chicago
Columbus
Cleveland
Milwaukee
Indianapolis
Des Moines
That's 6 major urban areas - I imagine that each of those has their own
LUG, and that from each
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 22:37 -0400, Ken VanDine wrote:
Based on the feedback the GMAE thread, let me suggest we re-invent
ourselves. I think it is obvious we are needed, but right now we
really don't have a direction. Let's fix this! We have the power to
do it... we just need to do it.
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 11:32 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 16:48 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
Here is my first attempt at putting everything on one page (with the
content from 2.14):
http://www.gnome.org/start/2.20/notes/en/
The good: This replaces notes/index.html,
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 18:56 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 10:46 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 11:32 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 16:48 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
Here is my first attempt at putting everything on one page
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 18:56 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 10:46 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 11:32 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 16:48 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
Here is my first attempt at putting everything on one page
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 22:03 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 13:01 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
Like last year, I'll go ahead and plug gnome-doc-utils. This is
the output of 'gnome-doc-tool html -d2 release-notes.xml':
http://www.gnome.org/~shaunm/notes2-20
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 15:36 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 22:03 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 13:01 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
Like last year, I'll go ahead and plug gnome-doc-utils. This is
the output of 'gnome-doc-tool html -d2 release
On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 12:11 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 15:36 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
We can do basically any style or content tweaks that are
necessary. This is using the latest g-d-u, which is code
that I'm intimately familiar with. (Caveat: the build
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 00:14 +0200, Erik Snoeijs wrote:
Hi,
I'm making a presentation for softwarefreedomday, but what i would
really need are a few old gnome screenshots. pre-1.0 and 1.4-ish. Theme
of the presentation is 10 years of gnome, so i need some old stuff, but
the web isn't really
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 16:21 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Lucas Rocha wrote:
Some initial ideas:
- GNOME Milk (With a white cow full of black GNOME foot marks)
- GNOME: the official desktop of happy people (with the usual smiley)
- Fuel for GNOME Hacking (Coffee Bean with a
A big thanks to everybody who worked on revamping our Friends of
GNOME pages. I did some proofreading and made some improvements.
Patch attached. I also want to bring a few things to the attention
of the list:
1) The thank-you page suggests subscribing to foundation-list to
get updates. I
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 15:51 -0700, Stormy Peters wrote:
How about a video contest for GNOME desktop tips and howtos? (Sriram
Ramkrisha had this great idea on IRC and I thought I'd bring it over
to the marketing list.)
Users upload them to YouTube and we put them all in one channel.
On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 12:35 +0100, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
Stormy Peters wrote:
Let me know what you need from me. I think I have all the text below
unless someone has feedback or suggestions on it.
Kalle Persson and myself spent some time on this last night and here is
a sketch.
Front
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 15:53 -0600, Brian Cameron wrote:
- The text says The Foundation has over 400 members, all contributors
to GNOME, who vote once a year.
Actually we now vote every 18 months
We had a single 18-month period to put the new board elections
closer to GUADEC so that the
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 17:51 -0600, Stormy Peters wrote:
I thought this was a good blog post on how to do a product
announcement or press release in today's world of social media.
http://socialmediasurfer.blogspot.com/2009/04/using-social-media-with-product-launch.html
Stormy
I really
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 16:37 +0100, Alex Hudson wrote:
Stormy Peters wrote:
+ Identify our target audience(s). Do we want to communicate with
existing GNOME users, all free desktop users, or try to reach out to
non-free-desktop users? (I think we can safely leave communicating
with
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 22:34 +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
Stormy Peters wrote:
Speaking of which, we do very little (if anything?) to advertise GNOME
apps. I think users pick operating systems based on apps. They have a
task, they pick an app. They don't decide to use Windows or Linux or
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 17:07 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On 05/05/2009 05:05 PM, Stormy Peters wrote:
I agree that if it's even a percentage of that, it might be worth it.
What would people think of trying it out for a couple of months? We
could start with Google ads to see how well ads
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 15:14 -0600, Paul Cutler wrote:
My understanding is the donation ruler is planned for a specific page
on the Friend of GNOME site / pages. (And the ruler is done thanks to
Shaun and Vinicius at the hackfest! More to come next week, just need
to finalize the number to
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 00:04 -0600, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
Several days of traveling later, I posted Day 2's summary:
http://jasondclinton.livejournal.com/78061.html
In the process of remembering everything. I remember having an idea
about how we could move from GNOME to Gnome but maintain
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 18:52 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Roberto
Galoppiniroberto.galopp...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/24 Luis Villa l...@tieguy.org:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Andre Klapperak...@gmx.net wrote:
Another heads-up to the legal list about
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 19:40 +, Lucas Rocha wrote:
2. Are there specific GNOME products we want to highlight or is this
page meant to be a complete list, or both?
Desktop and Platform. For the Platform, we could provide a good
summarized overview of:
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 10:43 -0600, Brian Cameron wrote:
Nelson:
Coming up with a good campaign requires a lot of discussion, and
takes time to develop properly. It is tricky to get the associations
right on.
I do think that there is general agreement that associating GNOME with
a
: extensive documentation and an SDK.
Shaun McCance and I were talking about this a couple of weeks ago. I'm
not trying to steal his thunder (and I hope he replies on list) but he
has spent a significant amount of time in the last couple of weeks and
has put together some thoughts around planning
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 07:06 -0800, Sandy Armstrong wrote:
With the understanding that we could always rebrand before this
deployment is open to the public, does anyone take issue with using
the Tomboy Online brand as we begin alpha testing?
I would really like to see this be the starting point
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 07:29 -0800, Sandy Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org wrote:
I'd have no objection to Tomboy Online personally. GNOME Notes would
also float my boat.
And I have no objection to that, either. online.gnome.org/notes would
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 21:37 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
El mar, 30-03-2010 a las 11:52 -0400, Owen Taylor escribió:
We can also point to various alternative desktops built on GNOME
technology - whether that's the continuing ability to run the GNOME 2
panel and window manager, or
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 11:33 -0600, Stormy Peters wrote:
There's a few events where I'm sure GNOME could have a booth.
Is anybody interested in representing GNOME at:
Southeast Linux Fest
Ohio Linux Fest
...
It's really time to start getting the word about GNOME 3 out there!
I'm
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 19:45 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 19:04 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le vendredi 21 janvier 2011, à 23:41 +0800, Frederic Muller a écrit :
So Hackfest registration is happening here:
http://live.gnome.org/Hackfests/GNOME.Asia2011 , call for papers
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 18:39 +0100, Florian Müllner wrote:
Hi everybody,
the designers have pushed an updated version of their mockup for GNOME
Shell's search results[0], mainly to bring them in line with the
window/application picker[1].
Those mockups have been implemented[2] and
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 21:08 +0100, Florian Müllner wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 14:20 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
Is there a functional change in the user experience that would
affect text descriptions? Or it just pixel shifting?
It's mostly pixel shifting. The section header (e.g
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 12:27 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
In the minds of a lot of people (press and GNOME hackers, and by proxy,
future users), GNOME 3 is very much the user experience defined by GNOME
Shell. And, while I don't have any data to back this up, I'd bet that
people are expecting GNOME
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 09:28 +, Allan Day wrote:
One other thing that we've spoken about is moving away from the
library/documentation format for the release notes. Hosting them
directly on gnome.org would give us a lot more freedom in terms of how
we present the notes (so they would look
I've just read over the release notes in git. Sorry for not doing this
sooner. I realize the notes are already supposed to be frozen, so I've
listed only things that I think are critical language problems.
== What's New for Users, p2-3
This includes smooth scrolling...
Other highlights for this
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 11:30 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote:
I've just read over the release notes in git. Sorry for not doing this
sooner. I realize the notes are already supposed to be frozen, so I've
listed only things that I think are critical language problems.
I just did a quick link check
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 17:34 +0300, alex diavatis wrote:
Further more, can I somehow get faces thumbs of all regular
contributor of Gnome in last year (excluding the guys they do docs coz
that would be
impossible)
What's wrong with getting images for documentation contributors?
There aren't
40 matches
Mail list logo
