Quoth Brian Holtz:
One of my strongest reservations about my recent
conversion to hardcore geolibertarianism is why it doesn't have higher
mindshare among libertarian intellectuals.
That's an easy question to answer: The Georgist theory of property in
land is radical in the sense that it goes
Thomas L. Knapp wrote:
TK) the only real explanation I can come up with for your not as bad
conclusion is there's enough not as bad stuff among the material I haven't
seen yet to trigger your net reduction fetish or something. (TK
Not as bad was about the extrema, not the sum, so you're swinging
The Robbins v. Pruneyard decision essentially decided that since the shopping
mall
is the new village green, that petitioners could get their signatures
there,
even though these shopping malls are private property.
Well, yes, they are. They're owned by the developers who got their
Edward Teyssier wrote:
ET) [Shopping malls are] owned by the developers who got their land USUALLY
(admittedly not always) by eminent domain. In other words, the local
municipality or county board of supervisors stole the underlying land from
its rightful owner (ET
Whether a given shopping mall
