Dear MARMAM community,


My co-authors and I are pleased to share our recent Open Access publication in 
Biological Conservation:



Findlay, C.R., Coomber, F.G., Dudley, R., Bland, L., Calderan, S.V., 
Hartny-Mills, L., Leaper, R., Tougaard, J., Merchant, N.D., Risch, D., & 
Wilson, B. (2024). Harbour porpoises respond to chronic acoustic deterrent 
device noise from aquaculture. Biological Conservation. 
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320724001319



Abstract:

Acoustic deterrent devices (ADDs) are used globally by the aquaculture industry 
to attempt to reduce pinniped depredation. However, noise from ADDs sited in 
areas used by cetaceans may lead to changes in cetacean behaviour and 
displacement from habitats impacting conservation status. Here, we investigate 
whether ADD noise from aquaculture within a habitat reduces acoustic detections 
of harbour porpoises, indicating either displacement or changes in echolocation 
activity. Nine years (2011–2019) of boat-based acoustic line-transect data for 
harbour porpoises were collected across the west coast of Scotland together 
with ADD presence and perceived loudness recorded by volunteers at regular 
listening stations along each transect. The most intense ADD noise coincided 
with significantly fewer harbour porpoise detections than in areas with no ADD 
noise. This corresponded with an estimated displacement of 34 % of the total 
undisturbed population, assuming that there was no change in echolocation 
behaviour. Furthermore, significant responses occurred at estimated received 
sound levels from ADDs >108 dB re 1 μPa RMS (frequency weighted for harbour 
porpoises). These findings suggest porpoises are either displaced from habitats 
degraded by intense ADD noise and/or echolocate less. In Scotland, ADD use in 
aquaculture has required a license since 2021. Limiting licensing, and 
monitoring ADD use by aquaculture should be considered by conservation managers 
globally, particularly in areas used by acoustically sensitive protected 
species. Non-acoustic (and non-lethal) measures to mitigate pinniped 
depredation on aquaculture sites are available and should be encouraged.



The full article is available open access at: 
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320724001319



Please feel free to contact us with any questions or to discuss further.



Best regards,



Charlotte R. Findlay

Marie Skłodowska-Curie Postdoctoral Research Fellow

Department of Biology, Section for Zoophysiology, Aarhus University

charlotte.find...@bio.au.dk<mailto:charlotte.find...@bio.au.dk>

@chazz_findlay
_______________________________________________
MARMAM mailing list
MARMAM@lists.uvic.ca
https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/marmam

Reply via email to