Dear colleagues,

My co-authors and I are happy to announce the publication of the following 
paper in Marine Ecology Progress Series:

Christiansen, F., Vivier, F., Charlton, C., Ward, R., Amerson, A., Burnell, S. 
& Bejder, L. 2018. Maternal body size and condition determine calf growth rates 
in southern right whales. Marine Ecology Progress Series 592:267-282.

In this study we used unmanned aerial vehicles to repeatedly measure the body 
size and condition of southern right whale mother and calf pairs through an 
entire breeding season in South Australia. Apart from the biological findings, 
the methodology used in this paper should be of interest to anyone interested 
in UAV photogrammetry work. The paper and supplementary materials detail the 
many aspects that need to be considered when doing UAV photogrammetry work on 
whales, including data filtering based on picture grading, error estimations, 
identifying minimum sample size and duration for estimating growth, and how to 
account for errors in sensitivity analyses etc..

Please find the abstract and a link to the paper below:

Abstract:
The cost of reproduction is a key parameter determining a species’ life history 
strategy. Despite exhibiting some of the fastest offspring growth rates among 
mammals, the cost of reproduction in baleen whales is largely unknown since 
standard field metabolic techniques cannot be applied. We quantified the cost 
of reproduction for southern right whales Eubalaena australis over a 3 mo 
breeding season. We did this by determining the relationship between calf 
growth rate and maternal rate of loss in energy reserves, using repeated 
measurements of body volume obtained from unmanned aerial vehicle 
photogrammetry. We recorded 1118 body volume estimates from 40 female and calf 
pairs over 40 to 89 d. Calves grew at a rate of 3.2 cm d−1 (SD = 0.45) in body 
length and 0.081 m3 d−1 (SD = 0.011) in body volume, while females decreased in 
volume at a rate of 0.126 m3 d−1 (SD = 0.036). The average volume conversion 
efficiency from female to calf was 68% (SD = 16.91). Calf growth rate was 
positively related to the rate of loss in maternal body volume, suggesting that 
maternal volume loss is proportional to the energy investment into her calf. 
Maternal investment was determined by her body size and condition, with longer 
and more rotund females investing more volume into their calves compared to 
shorter and leaner females. Lactating females lost on average 25%of their 
initial body volume over the 3 mo breeding season. This study demonstrates the 
considerable energetic cost that females face during the lactation period, and 
highlights the importance of sufficient maternal energy reserves for 
reproduction in this capital breeding species.

The paper can be accessed from the following link:


http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/meps/v592/p267-281/



Best regards,



Fredrik Christiansen

Postdoctoral Research Fellow
Cetacean Research Unit, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences
Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
+61 417 502 098, 
f.christian...@murdoch.edu.au<mailto:f.christian...@murdoch.edu.au>, twitter: 
@FChristiansen83
http://scholar.google.com.au/citations?user=vkA5Y3EAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=sra
http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Fredrik_Christiansen3/?ev=hdr_xprf

_______________________________________________
MARMAM mailing list
MARMAM@lists.uvic.ca
https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/marmam

Reply via email to