Hello all,

There are several recent publications from our Hawai’i research program that I 
thought folks would be interested in, listed below. PDFs are available on our 
Hawai’i publication page 
http://www.cascadiaresearch.org/hawaiian-cetacean-studies/publications or by 
request

Robin



Baird, R.W. 2019. Behavior and ecology of not-so-social odontocetes: Cuvier's 
and Blainville's beaked whales. In: Ethology and Behavioral Ecology of Toothed 
Whales and Dolphins, the Odontocetes. Edited by B. Würsig. Springer.

Information on the book can be found at 
https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783030166625 and the abstract of this chapter 
is below.

While beaked whales are the poorest-known family of cetaceans overall, the 
behavior and ecology of two species of beaked whales, Cuvier’s (Ziphius 
cavirostris) and Blainville’s (Mesoplodon densirostris), have been studied 
extensively for more than 15 years in multiple areas around the world. This 
research was largely initiated as a result of the susceptibility of both 
species to react to high-intensity navy sonars, sometimes resulting in the 
death of individuals. In this chapter long-term studies of both species in 
Hawai‘i are reviewed, informed by research on these species elsewhere. Both 
species have small populations that are resident to the island slopes, 
evidenced by a combination of long-term photoidentification and shorter-term 
satellite tag deployments. The two species coexist by partitioning their 
habitat in three dimensions, with Cuvier’s beaked whales being found in deeper 
water, and diving deeper, than Blainville’s beaked whales. Diving and acoustic 
behavior of the two species appears to be driven in part by predator avoidance. 
Both species echolocate only at depth, foraging deep in the water column during 
the day and at night, with less time spent near the surface during the day in 
between the deep foraging dives. Ascent rates are also slower than descent 
rates. All of these factors are likely ways of minimizing detection from 
near-surface visually or acoustically oriented predators such as large sharks 
and killer whales. There appears to be no strong selective pressure for 
grouping in these species. Both are often found alone and on average are found 
in very small groups (medians: Cuvier’s = 2; Blainville’s = 3). Groups that do 
form appear to function in part to avoid predators (for females with small 
calves) and allow for mating opportunities (for adult males seeking mates). 
Individuals of both species tend to have ephemeral social relations, although 
one pair of subadult Cuvier’s have been documented together over an 11-year 
period. Blainville’s beaked whale males exhibit female defense polygyny, while 
sperm competition may play a role in the mating system of Cuvier’s beaked 
whales. Studies of these species in multiple areas spanning the tropics to 
temperate waters in two different oceans are beginning to earn them an 
important place in our overall understanding of cetacean ethology and 
behavioral ecology.


Baird, R.W. 2019. How we learn about Hawai'i's dolphin and whale populations: 
do scientists really know what they are talking about? Hawaii Fishing News 
44(9):31-32.

A PDF copy is available at 
http://www.cascadiaresearch.org/files/publications/Baird_2019_HFN.pdf


Baird, R.W., D.L. Webster, S.M. Jarvis, E.E. Henderson, S.L. Watwood, S.D. 
Mahaffy, B.D. Guenther, J.K. Lerma, C.J. Cornforth, A.W. Vanderzee, and D.B. 
Anderson. 2019. Odontocete studies on the Pacific Missile Range Facility in 
August 2018: satellite-tagging, photo-identification, and passive acoustic 
monitoring. Prepared for Commander, Pacific Fleet, under Contract No. 
N62470-15-D-8006 Task Order 6274218F0107 issued to HDR Inc., Honolulu, HI.

A PDF copy is available at 
http://www.cascadiaresearch.org/files/publications/Bairdetal2019_Kauai.pdf and 
the executive summary is below.

As part of a long-term U.S. Navy-funded marine mammal monitoring program, in 
August 2018 a combination of vessel-based field effort and passive acoustic m 
onitoring was carried out on and around the Pacific Missile Range Facility 
(PMRF) off Kaua‘i prior to a Submarine Command Course scheduled for mid-August 
2018. The purpose of the monitoring effort was to assess the spatial movement 
patterns and habitat use of cetaceans that are exposed to mid-frequency active 
sonar and how those patterns influence exposure and potentially responses. The 
U.S. Navy funded 13 days of small-vessel effort and the National Marine 
Fisheries Service funded an additional 2 days of effort. Results from this 
effort were compared with previous Cascadia Research Collective (CRC) survey 
effort and photo-identification and tag data from Kaua‘i and Ni‘ihau, based on 
surveys in 10 different years since 2003. During the survey, the Marine Mammal 
Monitoring on Navy Ranges (M3R) system was used both to direct the research 
vessel to potential high-priority species, and to inform the research vessel 
when only low-priority species were detected on the range, allowing it to 
survey off the range and thus increasing overall encounter rates with 
high-priority species.

Over the course of the 15-day project, there were 1,597 kilometers (100.0 
hours) of small-vessel survey effort, resulting in 57 sightings of seven 
species of odontocetes. Of the 57 sightings, 24 were on PMRF representing five 
of the seven species, and of those, five were directed by M3R acoustic 
detections. During the encounters, we took 33,452 photographs for individual 
identification, with photographs added to long-term CRC regional 
photo-identification catalogs for short-finned pilot whales (Globicephala 
macrorhyncus), bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus), and rough-toothed 
dolphins (Steno bredanensis).

As expected based on previous CRC efforts off Kaua‘i and Ni‘ihau, rough-toothed 
dolphins were the most frequently encountered species, with 34 of 57 encounters 
(59.6 percent) being of this species. Nineteen of the 34 encounters were on 
PMRF, and three of those groups were found in response to acoustic detections 
from M3R (60 percent of all responses to acoustic detections). One sighting was 
of a mixed group of rough-toothed and bottlenose dolphins, only the third 
sighting of a mixed-species group involving those two species in a combined 780 
sightings of the two species in CRC’s Hawai‘i dataset. One location-only tag 
was deployed on a rough-toothed dolphin. During the five days of location data 
from the functioning tag, the tagged individual remained off the west coast of 
Kaua‘i, moving off and on PMRF on four occasions. A social network analysis of 
photo-identification data of rough-toothed dolphins indicated that the tagged 
individual was part of the resident, island-associated population.

Short-finned pilot whales were encountered on five occasions over a three-day 
period, and represented three different social groups. Depth-transmitting 
satellite tags that included Fastloc-GPS capability were deployed on 
individuals in two of the three groups, with tag deployments on 17 and 19 
August 2018 (the latter group cued by an acoustic detection from M3R). The 
group tagged on 17 August was linked by association with the main cluster of 
short-finned pilot whales known to be resident off the island of Hawai‘i, but 
re-sighted individuals have only been seen on one occasion off that island, so 
the group does not appear to exhibit strong fidelity to that area. The group 
tagged 19 August was linked by association with the western community of 
short-finned pilot whales known to be resident to Kaua‘i, Ni‘ihau, and O‘ahu. 
The third, untagged group (seen both on 17 and 18 August) had been previously 
tagged off Ni‘ihau in September 2015 and was thought to be from the resident 
western community, based on movements from tag data. The Fastloc-GPS tags were 
programmed to maximize obtaining Fastloc-GPS locations and dive data for a 
10-day window spanning the Submarine Command Course scheduled to start on 21 
August 2018. These tags produced more than twice as many Fastloc-GPS locations 
than Argos locations during the 10-day window, and behavior (i.e., dive and 
surfacing) data coverage during that period ranged from 77.4 to 99.3 percent. 
This programming regime was successful at producing high resolution information 
over a shorter-period of time in order to allow a detailed assessment of 
exposure and response to mid-frequency active sonar. Over a 37-day period the 
group associated with the eastern community (tagged 17 August) spent most of 
its time in deep water far offshore (median depth=4,215 meters [m], median 
distance from shore=73.3 kilometers [km]), with the track ending in slope 
waters off Hawai‘i Island. By contrast, the group associated with the western 
community (tagged 19 August) remained in slope waters (median depth=906 m; 
median distance from shore=6.9 km) around Kaua‘i over the 23 days the tag 
transmitted. This group remained in the area during the surface component of 
the Submarine Command Course, and location and behavior data will be used to 
assess exposure and response of the tagged individual to mid-frequency active 
sonar.

There were two encounters with melon-headed whales (Peponocephala electra) 10 
days apart. Based on a photo-identification match between the two encounters, 
they appeared to be the same group seen on two different occasions. Two 
Fastloc-GPS dive satellite tags were deployed during the first encounter, 
although location data were only obtained from one individual for just over 
nine days. This is only the third time that melon-headed whales have been 
satellite-tagged off Kaua‘i or Ni‘ihau. Over the 9 days of tag data, the 
individual moved 830 km, with a median depth and distance from shore of 2,220 m 
and 14.8 km, respectively.

Sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) were encountered on one occasion, with 
the vessel directed to the group based on acoustic detections from M3R, as the 
sperm whale group approached the range from the south. This was only Cascadia’s 
fourth encounter with sperm whales off Kaua‘i or Ni‘ihau. This group was widely 
dispersed (>4 km) and included at least one adult male, with long dives of 
approximately 1 hour in duration. Individuals were not approachable for tagging.

There was one sighting of pantropical spotted dolphins (Stenella attenuata), 
south of PMRF. One individual was satellite-tagged, although only a single 
location was received from the tag. Four biopsy samples were obtained, and will 
be analyzed for genetics to further understand population structure of this 
species in the islands. Bottlenose dolphins were encountered on six occasions, 
and good quality identifications of 36 distinctive individuals were obtained. 
Of those, 32 had been previously documented, and all were linked by association 
with the resident community of bottlenose dolphins from Kauaʻi and Niʻihau. 
Spinner dolphins (Stenella longirostris) were seen on eight occasions but this 
was a low-priority species so limited efforts were expended to work with them.

Probability-density analyses were undertaken using 12-hour locations from 
switching state-space models of tag-location data obtained for the three 
species for which tag data were available from this effort. Core areas (50 
percent kernel densities) were identified for the resident populations of 
rough-toothed dolphins (1,642 square kilometers [km2]), the Hawaiian Islands 
stock of melon-headed whales (82,431 km2), and the western community of 
short-finned pilot whales (7,517 km2). While the core areas for all three 
populations overlap with at least part of PMRF, the differences in the 
proportion of the core area that overlaps with PMRF suggests that the 
likelihood of exposure to mid-frequency active sonar on PMRF varies 
substantially between populations. Continued collection of 
photo-identification, movement, and habitat-use data from these species allows 
for a better understanding of the use of the range and surrounding areas, as 
well as estimation of abundance and examination of trends in abundance for 
resident populations.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Robin W. Baird, Ph.D.
Research Biologist, Cascadia Research Collective
Affiliate Faculty, Hawaiʻi Institute of Marine Biology
Mailing address:
Cascadia Research
218 ½ W. 4th Avenue
Olympia, WA 98501 USA
Hawaiʻi Cetacean Studies on the 
web<http://www.cascadiaresearch.org/projects/hawaii>
Follow us on Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/CascadiaResearch/>
Watch us on YouTube<https://www.youtube.com/user/CascadiaResearch>




_______________________________________________
MARMAM mailing list
MARMAM@lists.uvic.ca
https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/marmam

Reply via email to