******************** POSTING RULES & NOTES ********************
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*****************************************************************
WASHINGTON AND MOSCOW: HALT THE BOMBING AND STOP SUPPORTING DICTATORS IN
THE MIDDLE EAST!
Campaign for Peace and Democracy Statement
October 10, 2015
(to be posted soon at www.cpdweb.org)
Outside powers have had a long and shameful history of cynically
supporting dictatorships in the Middle East because maintaining friendly
autocratic states in the region suits their geopolitical objectives. And
today those criminal policies are flagrantly on display.
THE UNITED STATES
Since the end of the Second World War, the United States has been the
world’s leading ally of the Saudi Arabian kingdom, a violent,
ultra-reactionary fundamentalist dictatorship that this year has
beheaded more than a hundred people, possibly more than ISIS.[1] Saudi
Arabia is currently leading a bombing campaign in Yemen that has
indiscriminately killed many hundreds of civilians. Weapons—including
cluster bombs—intelligence, military advisers, and diplomatic support
for that bombing campaign are provided by Washington.
Egypt’s Mubarak dictatorship was backed by the United States for three
decades. He was ousted in the Arab Spring, but when the Egyptian
military took power again, Secretary of State John Kerry declared that
they were “restoring democracy”[2]—and U.S. military aid has been
restored.
As Israel continues its nearly 50-year dictatorial rule over the
Occupied Palestinian Territories, Washington provides the military aid
and diplomatic support at the United Nations that make the occupation
possible.
Although Damascus had long been allied with the Soviet Union and then
with Russia, Washington backed Syria’s bloody suppression of the
Palestinian movement and the Lebanese left in the 1970s and counted on
its support in the 1991 invasion of Iraq and the “war on terror.” Assad’s
torture chambers proved especially useful to the U.S. policy of “torture
by proxy,” which involved sending prisoners to Syria as part of the Bush
administration’s “extraordinary rendition” program.[3]
Assad’s usefulness to Washington ended when he drew too close to Iran
and seemed likely to be overthrown by the 2011 Syrian revolution. At
that point, U.S. policy shifted towards trying to win influence among
the rebels, though carefully limiting the kinds of weapons they could
receive.[4] More recently, Obama, along with Britain, France, and other
U.S. allies, has turned to a policy of selective bombing, not of Assad,
but of ISIS, and sometimes other opposition groups, leading most of the
rebels to condemn the air campaign.[5] Washington has generally favored
a “Yemen solution,” keeping Syria’s Baathist police state apparatus in
power, preferably without the Assad family mafia—although lately it has
moved towards the "political solution" favored by Paris and London,
which might include Assad.
ISIS might not even exist, or at least not wield the power it now
possesses, had not been for the U.S. invasion of Iraq. It was out of the
extreme chaos and vicious sectarian conflict which engulfed Iraq in the
wake of the American occupation that ISIS emerged, recruiting thousands
of brutal jihadi fighters in Iraq and especially in eastern Syria. This
was not, as many argue, because Saddam’s regime was thoroughly
dismantled, leaving a “power vacuum,” but because regime change was
imposed from outside by an American government that showed contempt for
the Iraqi people and hostility to genuine democracy. If Saddam Hussein’s
repressive state had been overthrown from within by a coalition of
Sunni, Shiite, and secular democratic movements against tyranny, the
subsequent history of Iraq—and Syria—might have been fundamentally
different. Certainly, this coalition would have been difficult to build
given Iraq’s long history of sectarianism, but the U.S. invasion stifled
any possibility of such a development.
We condemn and call for an immediate end to U.S. military
interventionism and support for dictatorships and authoritarian
governments in the Middle East and around the world. U.S. bombing of
Syria and Iraq must stop—likewise bombings of Afghanistan, where the
horrific slaughter of helpless hospital patients and medical personnel
in Kunduz has added a particularly gruesome outrage to the United States’s
long list of war crimes.
RUSSIA
Russia has been a major backer of the Assad family dictatorship since
its inception in 1970. Since the uprising against Bashar al-Assad in
2011, Russian support—along with support from Iran and Hezbollah—has
been critical to maintaining the survival of the Syrian regime. That
support has dwarfed the outside aid going to opponents of Assad. Now
Russia has markedly increased its military efforts on behalf of the
Syrian despot with bombing, the launching of cruise missiles, and the
announced possibility of “volunteer” ground troops.[6]
To be sure, ISIS is opposed by many—including by Syrian rebels—but
Russian military involvement is not confined to attacking ISIS. In fact,
Russian attacks seem on all accounts to concentrate on non-ISIS forces,
including against non-jihadi groups. Clearly, this serves to bolster the
Assad regime. (And, ironically, it may also be helping ISIS by weakening
those who have been fighting against them.[7]) Moreover, Russian bombing
has already killed numerous civilians and damaged medical facilities,
and there are reports of the use of cluster munitions.[8]
In his focus on non-ISIS rebels, Putin is behaving no differently from
Assad. Assad has always concentrated his fire on rebel groups other than
ISIS. In 2014, only 6 percent of Assad’s “counter-terrorism” operations
were aimed at ISIS.[9] (And ISIS returned the favor: only 13 percent of
their attacks that year targeted Syrian security forces.[10]) The Syrian
air force, in addition to barrel bombs and chlorine gas, is reported to
have been using cluster bombs since 2012.[11]
The exact strength of the non-jihadi forces among the Syrian rebels is
unclear, but what can’t be doubted is that attacking them is a major
blow in favor of the Assad dictatorship, which is why there have been
protests against the Russian bombings in Aleppo.[12]
Of course, Assad is thrilled at the new Russian role and Putin hides
behind Assad’s invitation to justify his intervention. But invitation by
a dictator provides no more legitimacy in the case of Syria than it did
when the South Vietnamese government invited in the U.S. armed forces or
when the Salvadoran junta invited in U.S. military advisers. Supporting
tyrants is wrong, invitation or not.
We condemn the Russian intervention on the side of the Syrian
dictatorship and demand that it cease immediately.
* * * * * *
The great powers have long pursued their own narrow interests in the
Middle East, whether on behalf of oil or strategic advantage, with no
concern for the well-being and democratic rights of the people of that
region. There is now a risk of spiraling escalation and superpower
conflict, with grave consequences.
On the ground, there are people armed and unarmed who are challenging
dictatorships across the region, aspiring to more democratic futures. It
is with them that we express our solidarity.
The inspiring popular uprisings of the Arab Spring opened up a new era
of democratic challenge from below to the police states of the Middle
East. Despite defeats in Egypt, Yemen, Bahrain and elsewhere, and
despite the drastically reduced strength of secular and non-jihadi
democratic oppositional forces in Syria, peoples’ revolution remains the
only progressive solution to the problems of authoritarianism,
repression, and sectarian strife in the region. The intervention of the
United States and Russia, as well as regional powers such as Saudi
Arabia, Iran and Turkey, rather than strengthening democratic forces,
instead creates a powerful obstacle to their success and indeed a threat
to their very survival. All of these states fear democracy in the Middle
East like poison.
We firmly reject the approach taken by the Obama administration and by
many on the left that choose support for Assad or his regime as the only
alternative to ISIS. The extraordinary barbarousness and cruelty of ISIS
have horrified much of the world. But the Syrian regime, a torture state
that has become one of the most murderous in the world today, is no
alternative, and its monstrous slaughter of the Syrian people in fact
serves to promote the spread of ISIS.
The suffering of the Syrian people, and of other peoples in the Middle
East, has been appalling. Only indigenous democratic forces are capable
of ending the peoples’ agony. That is why we continue to support the
authentically democratic elements of the Syrian revolution. Their
victory is by no means assured, but at the very least we must exert the
utmost pressure on the United States and Russia to abandon policies that
allow the dictators to continue torturing and murdering with impunity.
________________________________________
[1] Mint Press, "Saudi Arabia Beheads Nearly Twice As Many People As
ISIS So Far This Year," Aug. 25, 2015,
http://www.mintpressnews.com/saudi-arabia-beheads-nearly-twice-as-many-people-as-isis-so-far-this-year/208894/.
[2] Michael R. Gordon and Kareem Fahim, "Kerry Says Egypt’s Military Was
‘Restoring Democracy’ in Ousting Morsi," New York Times, Aug. 1, 2013,
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/02/world/middleeast/egypt-warns-morsi-supporters-to-end-protests.html.
[3] Center for Constitutional Rights, The Story of Maher Arar: RENDITION
TO TORTURE, 2008,
https://ccrjustice.org/sites/default/files/assets/FINAL%20updated%20rendition%20to%20torture%20report%20dec%2008.pdf.
[4] C.J. Chivers and Eric Schmitt, "Arms Airlift to Syria Rebels
Expands, With Aid From C.I.A.," New York Times, Mar. 24, 2013,
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/25/world/middleeast/arms-airlift-to-syrian-rebels-expands-with-cia-aid.html.
[5] Michael Karadjis, "Syrian rebels overwhelmingly condemn US bombing
as an attack on revolution," Sept. 25, 2014,
https://mkaradjis.wordpress.com/2014/09/25/syrian-rebels-overwhelmingly-condemn-us-bombing-as-an-attack-on-revolution/.
[6] Andrew E. Kramer and Anne Barnard, "Russian Soldiers Join Syria
Fight," New York Times, Oct. 5, 2015,
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/06/world/middleeast/russian-soldiers-join-syria-fight.html.
[7] Sam Jones, Noam Raydan, Kathrin Hille, "As Russia steps up Syria
bombardment, Isis gains ground in Moscow," Financial Times, Oct. 9,
2015,
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f058e1c4-6e97-11e5-8171-ba1968cf791a.html.
[8] Reuters, "At least 39 civilians, 14 fighters killed since start of
Russian air strikes: monitor," Oct. 3, 2015,
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/10/03/us-mideast-crisis-russia-casualties-idUSKCN0RX0D620151003;
Physicians for Human Rights, "Russian Warplanes Strike Medical
Facilities in Syria," Oct. 7, 2015,
http://physiciansforhumanrights.org/press/press-releases/russian-warplanes-strike-medical-facilities-in-syria.html;
Eliot Higgins, "Mounting Evidence of Russian Cluster Bomb Use in Syria,"
Oct. 6, 2015,
https://www.bellingcat.com/news/mena/2015/10/06/mounting-evidence-of-russian-cluster-bomb-use-in-syria/.
[9] Cassandra Vinograd and Ammar Cheikh Omar, "Syria, ISIS Have Been
'Ignoring' Each Other on Battlefield, Data Suggests," NBC news, Dec. 14,
2014,
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/isis-uncovered/syria-isis-have-been-ignoring-each-other-battlefield-data-suggests-n264551.
[10] Ibid. (5:1 "other armed groups" versus Syrian security forces).
[11] Richard Norton-Taylor, "Banned cluster bombs 'used in Syria,
Ukraine, Yemen, Sudan, Libya'," Guardian, Sept. 3, 2015,
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/03/banned-cluster-bombs-syria-ukraine-yemen-sudan-libya.
[12] Reuters, "Syrians protest against Russian air strikes," Oct. 4,
2015,
http://www.reuters.com/video/2015/10/04/syrians-protest-against-russian-air-stri?videoId=365825588.
_________________________________________________________
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at:
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com