At 06:47 PM 7/19/2005 +0900, CeJ wrote:
I'm wondering if the cold war actually transformed anything. And is
there really much more to say on the topic after Lakatos, Feyerabend,
but also the post-structuralists?
What does this mean?
More interesting to me has always been LP-related but not
I'm wondering if the cold war actually transformed anything. And is
there really much more to say on the topic after Lakatos, Feyerabend,
but also the post-structuralists?
What does this mean?
I think the book has a far too ambitious title? The intellectual
foundation of the Cold War could be
I read the Piaget article. The argument was very good. But then in the
below, the example of the mathematician as a child counting the pebbles
seems to me Piaget falls into a problem. An _individual_ child posed as if
she _rediscovers_ the process by which counting was discovered is , I think,
a
Oil and Gas: 'Twilight in the Desert' author Simmons talks Saudi oil supply,
int'l economy
Are the Saudis running out of oil, and are their reserve estimates accurate?
What other sources might help fill the gap if Saudi production declines? And
what will be the effects on the U.S. and world
CB,
There are so many signs that the petroleum economy is sliding downhill that
I'm beginning to believe that the Club of Rome projection of a petrol
producing plateau by the first decade of the 21st century is much more
likely than the current predictions of the end of rising production rates
6. RE: George Resich's *How the Cold War (CeJ)
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:01:01 +0900
From: CeJ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Marxism-Thaxis] Re: Marxism-Thaxis Digest, Vol 21, Issue 17
To: marxism-thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
snip
PiagetThe second reason is found in Godel's
PiagetThe second reason is found in Godel's theorem. It is the fact
that
there are limits to formalisation. Any consistent system sufficiently
rich to contain elementary arithmetic cannot prove its own
consistency. So the following questions arise: logic is a
formalisation, an
