Re:
1. Re: Does G?del Matter? (Oudeyis) 2. Re: Les Shaffer on Kurt G?del (Ralph Dumain) 3. Re: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Les Shaffer on Kurt G?del (Jim Farmelant) 4. Significance of incompleteness and uncertainity in science for dialectics (Oudeyis) 6. Les Shaffer on Heisenberg etc. (Jim Farmelant) 7. godel etc (Charles Brown) 8. godel etc (Charles Brown) 9. Les Shaffer on Kurt G?del (Charles Brown) 10. Re: Les Shaffer on Kurt G?del (Ralph Dumain) 11. More Godel (Charles Brown) 12. godel etc (was ...) (Charles Brown) 13. Re: More Godel (Ralph Dumain) 14. Does G?del Matter? (Charles Brown) 15. Re: Does G?del Matter? (Ralph Dumain) 18. More Godel (Charles Brown) 19. Re: More Godel (Ralph Dumain) 20. More Godel (Charles Brown) 23. Re: Does G?del Matter? (Oudeyis) 24. Re: More Godel (Oudeyis) 25. Re: More Godel ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-
There were lots of points spread out. I would like to comment on some.
It is obvious that theories of knowledge in general are not intended to be axiomatic systems. For first order theories we have a duality available between model-theory (semantics) and proof theory (syntax). One can always be transformed into the other formally. Marxist theories of knowledge include both semantic and methodological aspects. All mathematical systems are dialectical to different degrees. These are yet to be formalized as of now.
In physics they try all kinds of philosophy and so much non-physics tends to be done. Godel's theorem concerns AI and implementations thereof. Theoretically it can be written as a physical law in different physical systems ! Now if they have not done it as yet that can be a topic for a M.Phil theses.
A. Mani Member, Cal. Math. Soc
_______________________________________________ Marxism-Thaxis mailing list Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu To change your options or unsubscribe go to: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis
