On Tuesday 13 June 2006 23:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Re 5. Cornforth (Charles Brown)
> From: "Charles Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Marxism-Thaxis] Cornforth
> To: "'Forum for the discussion of theoretical issues raised by Karl
> Marx and the thinkers he inspired'"
> <marxism-thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> A. Mani
> Hello,
> I noticed that in his book 'Dialectical Materialism', Cornforth has
> seriously distorted the concept of 'dialectical contradiction' in
> particular.
> Compare those parts with Lenin's exposition of 'dialectical contradiction'
> in
> his philosophical notebooks for example. I believe this must be quite well
> known ... or is it ?
>
>
>
> A. Mani
>
> ^^^^^
> CB; What is the distortion ?
He reduces dialectical contradiction to negation in many words... that is his
conception. Not Marx's or even Hegel's.
A correct interpretation should be that
Suppose A and B are dynamically changing subjects.
Let A have a specific associated predicate P (P need not be a predicate
defining A).
Let B have a specific associated predicate Q
Then A is in dialectical contradiction to B if and only if P is the negative
of Q .
{Formally I am assuming that P, Q are all interpreted}
{'negative of' too need not be specifiable through a unary function... it may
be a binary relation}
{A set-theoretic ontology may be assumed. }
i.e. it is a 'negation' between certain associated predicates of dynamically
changing subjects.
Lenin summarizes Marxist dialectics very well and in simple terms.
A. Mani
Member, Cal. Math. Soc
Send instant messages to your online friends http://in.messenger.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis
