In a message dated 8/13/2009 1:51:41 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
cb31...@gmail.com writes:
CB: A point upon which sectarians/ultra-lefts, whether Stalinist or
Trotskyist, can agree.
Comment
Name calling is fine.
What the proletarian fighters coming to the fore need is understanding and
II.
How is the new logic against the poor - destitute proletarians, being
expressed?
The health Care debates are instructive. Over and over older workers
rallying against a single payer system - on Medicare, are asked why they oppose
single payer. I do not want government control over
On Aug 13, 2009, at 12:59 PM, waistli...@aol.com wrote:
Attacking the ultra right is nothing more than a clever way of
demanding
unconditional support of the Obama administration
Exactly.
Shane Mage
This cosmos did none of gods or men make, but it
always was and is and shall be: an
Shane Mage
Waistline2 at aol.com wrote:
Attacking the ultra right is nothing more than a clever way of
demanding
unconditional support of the Obama administration
Exactly.
^
CB: A point upon which
Well, at a very quick reading, I got a general idea of the
correlation of forces delineated by Waistline, though I will have to
study this again. But I don't understand how attacking the right =
unconditional support for Obama.
At 01:51 PM 8/13/2009, c b wrote:
Shane Mage
Attacking the ultra right is nothing more than a clever way of
demanding unconditional support of the Obama administration
Exactly.
^
CB: A point upon which sectarians/ultra-lefts, whether Stalinist or
Trotskyist, can agree.
Comment
1). It was in fact the Clinton Administration