[Marxism-Thaxis] formal logic not static [WAS: Parting of the Wa ys: Reviews (7)]

2008-07-15 Thread Charles Brown
Ralph Dumain There are some who confine logic to the consistency of sets of statements and the validity of inference, and others who mix it up with metaphysics. I belong to the former camp. Answering your question with a question: what exactly does it mean to say that something is

Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] formal logic not static [WAS: Parting of the Wa ys: Reviews (7)]

2008-07-13 Thread Ralph Dumain
There are some who confine logic to the consistency of sets of statements and the validity of inference, and others who mix it up with metaphysics. I belong to the former camp. Answering your question with a question: what exactly does it mean to say that something is identical or not

[Marxism-Thaxis] formal logic not static [WAS: Parting of the Wa ys: Reviews (7)]

2008-07-11 Thread Charles Brown
Ralph Dumain The law of identity is a property of statements, not things. ^^^ CB: So, there is no law that a thing must be identical with itself ? This message has been scanned for malware by SurfControl plc. www.surfcontrol.com ___

Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] formal logic not static [WAS: Parting of the Wa ys: Reviews (7)]

2008-07-11 Thread Ralph Dumain
Not in my book. At 03:05 PM 7/11/2008, Charles Brown wrote: Ralph Dumain The law of identity is a property of statements, not things. ^^^ CB: So, there is no law that a thing must be identical with itself ? ___ Marxism-Thaxis mailing list

Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] formal logic not static [WAS: Parting of the Wa ys: Reviews (7)]

2008-07-11 Thread Charles Brown
How can I get a copy of your book ? Why is it important to have a law that entities in statements are identical with themselves, but no similar law for actually existing things ? Ralph Dumain [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/11/2008 3:43 PM Not in my book. At 03:05 PM 7/11/2008, Charles Brown wrote:

Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] formal logic not static [WAS: Parting of the Wa ys: Reviews (7)]

2008-06-27 Thread Charles Brown
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/27/2008 9:43 AM Probably the most widely used ones are the books Irving Copi's including his book, Introduction to Logic www.amazon.com/Introduction-Logic-Irving-M-Copi/dp/0130102024 and his, Symbolic Logic

Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] formal logic not static [WAS: Parting of the Wa ys: Reviews (7)]

2008-06-27 Thread Ralph Dumain
A=A is not static. BTW, as a Trotskyist, Copi was subject to McCarthyite persecution, but I think he squeezed through by sticking to logic. Anyway, it's all in George Reisch's book. At 09:09 AM 6/27/2008, Charles Brown wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/27/2008 9:43 AM

Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] formal logic not static [WAS: Parting of the Wa ys: Reviews (7)]

2008-06-27 Thread Ralph Dumain
The law of identity is a property of statements, not things. At 09:55 AM 6/27/2008, Charles Brown wrote: Ralph Dumain [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/27/2008 11:47 AM A=A is not static. ^ A remains A. That's static. A turning into its opposite is change.