For some reason, natural scientists chose a jurisprudential metaphor as
central in its discourse. In the original context, laws _are_ broken, i.e. ,
they are not absolute. In fact the central dialectical law is abstract
"anti-absolute lawism": All laws are eventually broken, everything turns
into its opposite, at a certain point.

Charles

 
From: "Chris Burford" <

>
> Since discussion lists thrive on the creative contrast of ideas - on
> contradiction - as well, hopefully, on some unity - I will just pick
> the important point on the interpretation of "laws"
>
> >>It was on the question of dialectical "laws",
> which she tacitly assumed, as do sloppy
> Marxist thinkers on the subject (i.e. most of them), that these 
> "laws"
> are something like laws of nature.
> Engels himself is responsible for this half-assed thinking,
> which is why I don't think it is useful to invest
> oneself in what Engels literally says.<<
>
> I don't know how responsible Engels was for a mechanical reading of
> this idea, (as I would put it).
>
> It seems likely,  he was at least partly responsible because that 
> was
> so much the thinking of the age.
>
> However there is a phrase in Engels' late supplement to Capital Vol
> III which suggests a wider perspective on the important "Law of
> Value", which is the title of the essay:-
>
> "the Marxian law of value holds generally, as far as economic laws 
> are
> valid at all, for the whole peirod of simple commodity-production 
> ...
> "   A few other phrases in the paragraph suggest a flexible
> understanding of this, including a reference to oscillation around a
> value which sounds very much like a strange attractor.
>
> I make this the 17th paragraph in the essay, in case people want to
> look at it again. It is probably most easily recognised at a glance 
> by
> the BC dates in it of 2,500 5,000 4,000 6,000.
>
> Regards
>
> Chris Burford
>
> 



_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to