[Marxism] Is it a trap?

2017-02-04 Thread Gary MacLennan via Marxism
  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

Over at Crikey.com Guy Rundle has penned a piece entitled *Rundle: liberal
howls of outrage over Muslim ban play into Trump's tiny hands*. It is
behind a paywall and I won't pay money to read the kind of rubbish that
liberals turn out every time the people/working class enter the stage of
history. Every mass reaction has had some soi-disant leftist say it is a
trap and we are falling into it. James Butler of NovaraMedia has answered
that very well

http://www.huckmagazine.com/perspectives/opinion-perspectives/ignore-trumpologists/

and so has Richard Seymour
http://www.leninology.co.uk/2017/01/against-omniscience.html

and Sam Kriss

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/02/liberals-on-the-edge-of-a-nervous-breakdown-214727

The liberal intelligentsia who say the protests are playing into Trump's
hands are repeating the reaction of Matthew Arnold to the riot in Hyde Park
in 1866. Then as now the intellectual feared the spectacle of the sans
culottes becoming a political subject.

The only hope for humanity is that the mass protests continue.  They have
shocked Team Trump to the core.  For sure protesting can initially lead to
a reaction.  But it is clear that not to protest would be an absolute
disaster. It would embolden Trump and weaken the opposition to him from
inside the State.

I lived through the Bjelke-Petersen years when he played a vanguard role
for the Far Right and the onset of Neo-liberalism through his use of
unchecked parliamentary powers. As I have said there was a constant chorus
of "He wants us to protest" and "You protesters are laying into his hands".

Petersen was supposed to be a tactical genius who laid traps for Leftists
like me.  He was an impulsive bumbling idiot who did not finish a sentence
for 20 years and who relied totally on the craven cowardice of the liberals.

Sound familiar?

comradely

Gary
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


[Marxism] Greece: the scissors trap

2015-07-15 Thread Louis Proyect via Marxism

  POSTING RULES  NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly  permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

(This was posted on FB by Jeff Richards. It overlaps with my article on 
the drachma conversion issues.)


Greece: The scissors trap.
The story of why Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras changed his mind in 
the July 2015 negotiations with the European Union will, I am sure, be 
revealed by memoirs and investigative reporting in the future. At 
present any political assessment must be provisional. I am not one of 
those on the radical left (and the radical right in the case of Nigel 
Farrage) who are now letting off a lot of steam with cries of 
‘treachery’ or ‘betrayal’ etc. etc. etc.


Former Finance minister in the Syriza government Yanis Varoufakis, in a 
wide ranging interview with Phillip Adams on the radio programme Late 
Night Live alluded to one of the reasons why Tsipras recommitted himself 
to negotiations with the EU. Grexit would have required a new currency, 
a new Drachma. The task of creating a new currency is a very big 
organisational undertaking. Adams reminded the listener the vast 
logistical operation that was required to implement a new currency in 
Iraq following the invasion of that country by the Bush and Blair 
administrations.


Varoufakis said in the interview that the new Syriza government did have 
plans to opt for a new currency and they had assigned a special 
committee to look into the matter. That committee consisted of five 
members, whereas Varoufakis said that they would need to have a minimum 
of 500 personnel to take the process of a new currency to the next 
level. The reason why the finance ministry (which Varoufakis was leading 
at the time) did not take it to this next stage was the fear that 
setting up such a government department would harm the negotiations with 
the EU ministers. So the Greek government was caught in a trap, on the 
one hand trying to negotiate with intransigent ministers and hoping to 
exploit internal divisions within the EU -between Germany and France- 
and on the other hand not trying to do anything that might harm the 
negotiations with the EU (like being seen to be creating a new currency).


Greece exiting the European Currency Union (which is not the same as the 
European Union) is not an impossibly difficult task. It is however, a 
major logistical operation that would require the full mobilisation of 
the resources of the state, and the backing of the citizenry to 
implement. Syriza have alway indicated that it was their intention to 
try to negotiate and remain in the Euro with improved conditions. Plan B 
would have been to create a new currency. Syriza were simply unprepared 
for plan B, and were left with no option but to swallow the poison and 
hope they will survive without the country descending into a nazi 
revival. In many ways, it is an understandable why Syriza were caught 
unprepared. The relative newness in government, the enormity of the 
problems they were faced with, the urgent need to focus on meeting the 
needs of those left destitute by the policies of previous right wing 
governments. Most speculatively, I wondered if the lack of party cadres 
with limited experience in managing governments and state bureaucracies 
also played a role in the ‘turnaround’ by Tsipras.

_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com