themselves Marxist Leninist that really count in the
long run, since parties can come and go it is the
dictatorship of the class, i.e. of the proletariat,
that's supreme. And that's what I think of you.
[By the way, I'm a he and not a she]
Respectfully,
frankenstein580
--- Mark Scott
parties can come and go it is the
dictatorship of the class, i.e. of the proletariat,
that's supreme. And that's what I think of you.
Sincerely,
Frankenstein580
--- Mark Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frankenstein,
You are correct in that I don't know you. I know
Internet discussions on Marxist List tend to more
resemble theoretical
journals, rather than leaflets and pamphlets tailored
to a living
audience of
workers seeking some kind of action. Communists
fight wherever they
are at, be
it a wealthy or poor community.
The most destitute of the proletarian masses work and
work basically
everyday in the imperial centers.
COMMENT
Here is the subject of the discourse. Destitute is
defined as: without the basic necessities of life :
the charity cares for destitute children.
[ predic. ] ( destitute of) not
Marxism Leninism is the ideology of the Proletariat,
and you have quoted the definition for us.
I see this list as a means of sharing our ideas and
experience to better our approach to organizing and
leading the proletariat in our day to day struggle.
Everyone appreciates the
Thank you.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Despite all these, some of the defenders of Stalin
of that period, and
now, pursued political arguments and totally
overlooked to the economic
policies of the New Line. These so called defenders
of Stalin followed
the arguments of Mao
I would declare that for there to be a bourgeois class
in power there would have to be private ownership, and
the buying and selling of labor power, at the very
least. Referring back to the Soviet Union under
Lenin and Stalin, we all know that there was some
capitalism allowed; China resorted
On February 7, 1990 the Central Committee of the
Communist Party of the Soviet Union agreed to give up
its monopoly of power. Over the next several weeks,
the 15 constituent republics of the USSR held their
first competitive elections. Reformers and ethnic
nationalists won many of the seats.
By
HERE! HERE! YOU'VE GOT MY VOTE!
--- Åöçìåñßäá Áíáóýíôáîç [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In answer to goran vlajkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
about the use of the term Stalinism by our
organisation we send you the the following position.
It is absolutely correct and adoptable to use
Anyone will finally decide their way, but I'll put my
two cents here if I may. I don't understand the
disagreement on the question of Poland since she
rejected Soviet aid; and when Hitler finally
attacked, neither England nor France nor anyone else
assisted Poland. The peace hypocrites
.
Comradely
f580
--- Rolf Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also these arguments of yours, frankenstein580, in
my opinion don't change
that fact, concerning this question of history, that
the pact policy in
1939-41 including the Winter War went against the
interests of the vast
Without question the semi-criminal strata is always
present and this is not a lumpen proletariat as such,
but a mass of workers
working off the books, or what in Soviet society was
officially called the
workers in the illegal economy and their managers.
MY COMMENT
Would comrade
I think we both understand each other. An action
slogan is not the
meaning
of communist strategy which is why Stalin works were
referenced. An
action
slogan is a tactical thing by definition.
MY COMMENT:
Correct, thank you. And so tactics are subordinate
to stategy and TURNING EVERY
Here is an old article that I found in the internet
which mesmerized me for its duration. I don't believe
that its author is a communist but its content is
revealing nevertheless. Enjoy comrades!
http://arunshourie.voiceofdharma.com/print/19970912.htm
WAISTLINE WRITES:
You are welcome to your views. I reject a socialist
vision of America and
advocate communism, which means one is not require to
labor as the basis for
receiving socially necessary means of life. The low
level and scattered
character of the productive forces in Russia made
Bharatiya Janata Party.
A careful reading of the link shows that it is an
attack on the social forces for emancipation in
India.
This may not be clear to a non-Indian reader.
editor_revdem
- Original Message -
From: frankenstein580 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: marxist-leninist-list
To call itself the Party of the proletariat Marxist
Leninist would be rooted within the class first. In
the absence of such a Party, it is the duty of Marxist
Leninist to construct one. In the event that various
parties coexist, then it is the duty of Marxist
Leninist to unite them. That is in
To call itself the Party of the proletariat Marxist
Leninist would be rooted within the class first. In
the absence of such a Party, it is the duty of Marxist
Leninist to construct one. In the event that various
parties coexist, then it is the duty of Marxist
Leninist to unite them. That is in
To call itself the Party of the proletariat Marxist
Leninist would be rooted within the class first. In
the absence of such a Party, it is the duty of Marxist
Leninist to construct one. In the event that various
parties coexist, then it is the duty of Marxist
Leninist to unite them. That is in
If comrade Waistline believes that his doctrine of
communism should replace Marxism then he has already
said so. He has already replaced the working class,
to which he aflicts grave contempt after they paid his
way to a rosy middle class life, with that of the
lumpen proletariat as the vanguard
But Marxism does exist and it was not invented by
the proletariat, nor could
it be.
MY COMMENTS:
Humbug! Communism is also a spontaneous and
subjective thing, as it is inevitble, and in its
absence we would INVENT IT!
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marxism, of course is a
But Marxism does exist and it was not invented by
the proletariat, nor could
it be.
MY COMMENTS:
Humbug! Communism is also a spontaneous and
subjective thing, as it is inevitble, and in its
absence we would INVENT IT!
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marxism, of course is a
Let it be said, that in the U.S.A exists an admirable
contingent of revolutionary communist parties,
organizations, groups, and individuals capable of
leading the proletariat in the struggles against
Imperialist wars, chauvinism, fascism,etc. at the
particular stage that we're in, and working
Leninist understand that Trade Unions have prov-en to
function as the transmission belts between the state
[Party included] and the people. Workers organized
into unions became PART of the administration of
society in the Soviet Union, Albania, China, Korea,
Cuba, and now Venezuela. Unions
The Poverty of Philosophy is the first thought that
came to my mind.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If comrade Waistline believes that his doctrine of
communism should replace Marxism then he has
already
said so. He has already replaced the working
class,
to which he aflicts grave
http://futureoftheunion.com/?page_id=4110
Here is an interesting article depicting the betrayals
by the union bureacracy as well as symptoms of
capitalist collapse.
Mr. Onasch is a prestigioius trade unionist leader of
the UAW, ATU, and elected representative of a Labor
Party council. Mr.
Imperialism is the abomination to the world. It is
the manisfestation of destructive barbarity, the
epitome of wretched expoitation and butchery world
wide. May the multitude led by the international
proletariat exterminate it.
Nothing could compare to the sweat shops of China,
India,
90 years have passed since the Great October Socialist
Revolution and we are now forced to answer the
question: how much has really changed in the global
productive capability since the electronics
revolution? Computers and robots are replacing
humanity, no doubt, that is their purpose to
We thank you for such an inspiring video. I only
regret not being able to understand the language, but
the images speak for itself.
Comradely,
f580
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A racy video from the CP Crimea comparing the Soviet
past with the present:
October 20th, 2007
Report on the Labor Conference to Stop the War
On October 20 more than 150 trade unionists from
across the U.S. and
internationally participated in the first ever antiwar
conference
called for the purpose of spurring workers actions to
stop the war.
Though many workers were
But this working class was new not
in its relations to production, since it still
remained the exploited class,
WAISTLINE'S COMMENT:
The working class is never new in relationship to it
remaining an
exploited class, up to the October revolution and the
building of
socialism. Even
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The manifestations in Moscow on the 90th Anniversary
of the October Revolution
See the video prepared by the Communist Party of the
Russian Federation
at http://www.pceml.info/
Click on the blank screen a little way down.
--
My life has
To the comrades of the MLL.
The theoretical polemic that occupies some of us over
this particular thread, is mostly on the question of
a 'NEW CLASS' of proletarians as expounded by those
who would call themselves communist first and then
Marxists second, or third.
Marxists, of course, are
Again I shall underline the arguments:
WAISTLINE SAYS:
One does not have to own a factory to be a capitalist
or regarded as a
capitalist according to Marx writings in Capital. One
does not have to
work to be
treated as or regarded as proletarian'
MY COMMENTS:
Again, this is the
http://www.pww.org/article/articleprint/10497/
Found at:
http://www.pww.org/article/articleprint/10497/
Venezuelan Communists push workers councils
Search WWW Search pww.org
Author: W. T. Whitney Jr.
People's Weekly World Newspaper, 02/01/07 14:12
The Communist Party of
WAISTLINE CONCLUDES:
Comrade F 580 . . . perhaps you need to read a
broader variety of
literature
about world events and history
F580 CONCLUDES:
The problem here is not really that we should read
more about world events, indisputably we must all
broaden our world outlook. Even non
ONLY MARXIST LENINISTS CAN REAFFIRM COMMUNISM
There is a well-known saying that if geometrical
axioms affected human interests attempts would
certainly be made to refute them. Theories of natural
history which conflicted with the old prejudices of
theology provoked, and still provoke, the most
REAFFIRM MARXIST LENINISTS! PAY ATTENTION AND STUDY!
BEHOLD THE NEW COMMUNIST POLITICS!
Economic Globalization: Capitalism In The Age Of
Electronics
Economic Globalization: Capitalism In The Age Of
Electronics
Noam Chomsky
Every exploiting ruling class has had its global
dimension and
REVOLUTIONARY MARXIST LENINIST FROM LATIN AMERICA; AND
LE DUAN A DISTINGUISHED VIETNAMESE COMMUNIST ON THE
VANGUARD ROLE OF THE WORKING CLASS
Problems of the Revolution in Latin America
http://www.tdkp.org/US/US-10/la_seminar_10.htm
Final statement of the 6th international seminar:
Dear Comrade editors of revdem,
I wish to express my condolences to the 14 innocent
people killed and the many injured by the police at
Nandigram and also my ardent support to those women
who were raped; and may justice be served on the
government criminals responsible.
I've been following the
Spoken like a true conciliator by a man who can't even
get along with his own class. Check out the world
fool.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm beginning to question the purpose of this list.
Let me say this much. I respect Mao and his
contributions to revolutionary
WAISTLINE COMMENTS:
I will try checking out the world.
Many people play the fool some times in life.
MY COMMENT:
You do that.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Spoken like a true conciliator by a man who can't
even
get along with his own class. Check out the world
fool.
Like you say, people determine what is beauty and what
is ugly. And each class or race or nationality has
their own historical concept. It is not merely
forced upon us by the class in power or relations.
Beauty is subjective. We all understand that.
Except, of course, ALL of you. People
A REPOST:
REVOLUTIONARY MARXIST LENINIST FROM LATIN AMERICA; AND
LE DUAN A DISTINGUISHED VIETNAMESE COMMUNIST ON THE
VANGUARD ROLE OF THE WORKING CLASS
Problems of the Revolution in Latin America
http://www.tdkp.org/US/US-10/la_seminar_10.htm
Final statement of the 6th international
I'LL TELL YOU THIS MUCH REVISIONIST, I KNOW WHO YOU
SPEAK FOR.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marx and Engels proclaim the working class as
that
only truly revolutionary class facing CAPITAL.
Capitalism still exits and it is our duty to
overthrow
it.That hasn't changed.
HERE IS THE MAN THING ABOUT IT. YOU STAND IN THE
WAY OF THE MIGHTY WORKING CLASS WHOM YOU ARE
CONTEMPTUOUS OF AND WE'LL RUN YOU OVER.
{By the way, after my wife and 3 year old daughter
died, I took my two surviving sons and eventually
became homeless and lived in a shelter. I picked
myself
WAISTLINE PROBES:
You have never given anyone, at any rate me, the
opportunity to know
of whom
you speak of in American society, other than the 7.4
percent of the
workers
in trade unions.
The more we discuss the clearer the issue becomes.
Who are you speaking of as advocate of the
Welcome back Scotty!,
Your note has been a breath of fresh air.
f580
--- Mark Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comrade f580,
I must first apologize because I have not received
the
posts of Melvins you are responding to therefore I
cannot respond except on assumptions and I
are surviving AIDS with proper
treatment!
Take care.
f580
--- Rolf Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
f580, you wrote, to the list MLL, (also quoting from
my message):
- Original Message -
From: frankenstein580 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: For the reaffirmation of Marxism-Leninism
The reason that AIDS can be any of 25 diseases is
because HIV attacks the immune system. It attaches
itself to the T4 white blood cell and destroys it.
Now doctors would have to treat any of the
consequential 25 illnesses caused by the deficiency.
In the course of life and nature you have
I HOPE THIS LINK CAN SHED SOME LIGHT ON THE MATTER
AIDS Denialists Who Have Died
A partial list of HIV-positive HIV/AIDS denialists who
have died from conditions, and with symptoms,
characteristic of AIDS
None of the scientists and journalists who are the
most prominent promoters of HIV
-subservient medical
doctors. On the demonstrable facts, see my reply to
George.
Rolf
- Original Message -
From: frankenstein580 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: For the reaffirmation of Marxism-Leninism
marxist-leninist-list@lists.econ.utah.edu
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 2:42 PM
WORLD AIDS DAY. The people of the world vs. the
quacks.
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/5502C378-0029-49C5-81F9-EEBF87ADD248.htm
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
The best overall history of Russian Revolution: THE
HISTORY OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE USSR [BOLSHEVIK]
They made the revolution they wrote the history.
Then perhaps Carr.
--- Calvin Broadbent [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Please can comrades say what they think is the best
I challenge AIDS denialists to exchange bodily fluids
with anyone who has been diagnosed with AIDS. When
you finally become infected I'll bet that you'll soon
change your tune. Some denialists who have dared take
this challenge are now dead.
What makes some people believe that only U.S.
Comrade Mark and MF,
I agree. Globalization is not a negation of
Imperialism in the sense that it replaces it.
Globalization is the inescapable expansion of world
relations brought about coincidentally by Imperialism
and facilitated by the electronics revolution. It is
not globalization that
On AIDS denialists, I still believe that their
position is very wrong,
though I admit not to having studied the question
sufficiently. I am
sympathetic to the critique of frankenstein but I am
opposed to what is
essentially his call to the denialists to commit
suicide by exchanging
I must admit that while I didn't read your bull shit I
was hoping that you'd try the experiment.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I challenge AIDS denialists to exchange bodily
fluids
with anyone who has been diagnosed with AIDS. When
you finally become infected I'll bet that
Hi Calvin. BOO!
--- Calvin Broadbent [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is outrageous. I don't much go for Comrade
Melvin's new class schtick. But this is simply
beyond the pale. Is Franky a spy?
Message: 2 Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 14:57:12 -0800
(PST) From: frankenstein580
WAISTLINE QUOTES MARX!
In a higher phase of communist society, after the
enslaving subordination
of the individual to the division of labor, and
therewith also the antithesis
between mental and physical labor, has vanished; after
labor has become not
only a means of life but life's prime
I'll tell you something coward. You change your
story [politics] more than you change panties. Like a
real opportunist.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For example: Why would anyone omit the Socialist
stage as a transition to communism. Is there any
slight indication in the
WAISTLINE ETHICS:
Are you behaving like the old slave master in your
attitude concerning
the
poverty stricken and destitute, insisting that their
plight is that of
their
own making?
NO HOLDS BARRED!
MY RESPONSE:
CAPITALISM DOES WHAT CAPITALISM IS, The proletariat
has no power over
THE WORKING CLASS TAKES THE LEAD IN THE CONSTRUCTION
OF COMMUNISM
Socialism is a reality that must be confronted.
Industries exist in socialist korea and socialist
Cuba. The working class of the United States is
currently NOT the vanguard to the world communist
revolution. In fact,
in
www.allianceml.com/china/koreaNS.htm,
that the DPRK is led by revisionists and not
economically socialist.
It would be good if I could agree that the DPRK is
socialist, but I need more information.
Michael Pollock
--- frankenstein580 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
THE WORKING CLASS TAKES
WAISTLINE PROPOSES:
What compelling reason is there for the state - as a
state power, to
own any
aspect of the means of production fundamental for
reproduction of
socially
necessary means of life
MY COMMENTS:
During the first stage of communism we would have
wrested power from the
and Stalin.
Stalin was loved by the masses not only in SU but
world over not because he made N bombs but he
showed way how a backward country could achieve
material progress not like North Korea?
RG
frankenstein580 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I probably know as much of north
and Stalin.
Stalin was loved by the masses not only in SU but
world over not because he made N bombs but he
showed way how a backward country could achieve
material progress not like North Korea?
RG
frankenstein580 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I probably know as much of north
and Stalin.
Stalin was loved by the masses not only in SU
but
world over not because he made N bombs but he
showed way how a backward country could achieve
material progress not like North Korea?
RG
frankenstein580 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I probably know as much
Comrade Mark,
I thank you comrade for advocating on my behalf. I
hope that our companionship be principled and long
lasting.
Fraternally,
f580
--- Mark Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comrade George,
You have my full agreement about this matter of
disciplined conduct as
WAISTLINE ASSERTS:
I assert and will defend the proposition that the
brutality and slaughter
that was New World Conquest has its genesis in a
history of human behavior that
flows from man inherited metabolic breach and not the
changes in the form of
wealth, productive forces and abstract
WAISTLINE:
You misunderstood the issue. The metabolic breach is
the genesis of
property
. . . private property.
MY RESPONSE:
Excuse me then.
WAISTLINE:
There was no hunter gatherer period of human history
as such. .
Rather there was a gatherer-hunter period of history
MY
Gibberish!Can anybody decipher this s#$%.
Oops!
The problem is not so much that WAISTLINE revises
Marxism Leninism but more so that he then makes a
mockery of it.
Or is it that I understand NOTHING of Marxism
nowadays? Does anyone?
Pardon me for dragging the MLL into this.
The
WAISTLINE:
The genesis
of
private property cannot be explained on the basis of
productive forces.'
MY RESPONSE:
Yes. What can not be explained is the genesis of the
metabolic breach.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WAISTLINE:
There was no hunter gatherer period of human
TO WAISTLINE:
Most of us Marxist understand what Marx and Lenin
meant, that's why we are what we are, thank you.
Your concoctions are incoherent, perhaps you should
drink some coffee. But blab on, it's your right.
I'll engage with WAISTLINE on this though.. social
and technical aspects
.
This is my humble opinion for now. Remember that I
speak for myself and am an ordinary worker with some
knowledge and an attitude.
Fraternally,
f580
--- marxist front [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comrade Frankenstein,
Our observation interleaved
frankenstein580 [EMAIL PROTECTED
Oh the great Engels he is indeed a genius. Thank
you.
I see no error in these writings. Now how WAISTLINE
applies this to his metabolic breach thing awaits to
be seen.
f580
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is Engels opening line:
Labour is the source of all wealth,
WAISTLINE QUOTES ENGELS AND COMMENTS:
1). A meat diet contained in an almost ready state
the most essential
ingredients required by the organism for its
metabolism.
This is not correct.
2). By shortening the time required for digestion, it
also shortened
the
other vegetative bodily
Sorry but was on lunch break and will later explain
why I think and
believe
private property has its genesis in the metabolic rift
within man
himself. The
problem is tackling the theory of metabolism, which
is old hat.
WAISTLINE:
At any rate private property has its genesis as an
WAISTLINE:
This is really the same argument as the viral theory
of disease in its
underlying theory exposition.
Lastly, there is a reason I invest energy into
forwarding material to
this
list on food.
MY COMMENTS:
True, so we reach the same conclusions.
--- [EMAIL
The private property relations cannot grow out of
trade of things. The
only
thing that can grow from trade is the impulse to
creates products.
Products
does not mean commodities.
The answer must lie elsewhere.
MY COMMENTS:
I think that you have it backwards ? First came the
impulse
Nice vision.
Now we still have an abomination that is Imperialism
which is causing havoc among the metabolic people of
the earth to deal with. Do you have any vision for
that?
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The state and dictatorship are one thing, and the
administration of
The problem with WAISTLINE's economic communism is
this:
Robots and computers don't make revolution, people
make revolution. Robots and computers are machines
invented by people so that people may utilize it to
facilitate their LABAOR a bad word in WAISTLINE's
vocabulary, but the most
Dear WAISTLINE,
Your vision is not my vision. You are a racist.
History reveals that people of all colors have
conquered. You have expressed your contempt towards
the proletariat, work, and the soviet revolution, and
hence toward any proletarian revolution. You speak
with forked tongue.
WAISTLINE PHILOSOPHY:
I am called a fool, degenerate and revisionists for
stating the
obvious. I
write about the us we are scared to face. I write
about why we are
barbarians. Let's assume I am wrong. No one can
convince me that
cruelty flows from
inanimate objects and blame social
Your problem is that you're and Idle worshiper and a
labor hack.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem with WAISTLINE's economic communism
is
this:
Robots and computers don't make revolution, people
make revolution. Robots and computers are machines
invented by people so
My evidence is for all to see in your notes to the
MLL.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your vision is not my vision. You are a racist.
History reveals that people of all colors have
conquered. You have expressed your contempt towards
the proletariat, work, and the soviet
Your notes expose your contempt towards Stalin, the
soviet revolution, the proletariat, and Marxism
Leninism. Your contempt, despite your pretty vision,
will never be embraced by the working class. Why,
because you despise us. But the feeling is mutual.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WAISTLINE:
Comrade you sound like a theoretical coward scared to
realize the depth
of
your own slavery. Why are you so obsessed and filled
with hate
concerting a
society where labor is voluntary?
MY COMMENT:
What the working class won't allow is racist cowards
to sit idle while
WAISTLINE:
Slogans cannot answer difficult questions that
require study and patience. Why
fight a proposition before trying to think things
out?
MY COMMENTS:
The idiosyncrasies which WAISTLINE raises to occult
concepts familiar to revolutionary political
scientists apparently prove not
WAISTLINE QUOTES MARX:
'We must avoid repeating the mistake of the political
economist, who
bases
his explanations on some imaginary primordial
condition. Such a
primordial
condition explains nothing. It simply pushes the
question into the grey
and
nebulous distance. It assumes as
WAISTLINE QUOTES MARX:
'We must avoid repeating the mistake of the political
economist, who
bases
his explanations on some imaginary primordial
condition. Such a
primordial
condition explains nothing. It simply pushes the
question into the grey
and
nebulous distance. It assumes as
In a higher phase of communist society, after the
enslaving subordination of the individual to the
division of labor, and with it also the antithesis
between mental and physical labor, has vanished, after
labor has become not only a livelihood but life's
prime want, after the productive forces
WAISTLINE:
Marx did not write Work will become man's prime
want.
In my opinion, the socialist idea, that writes on its
banner, He Who
Does
Not Work, Shall Not Each, is in appropriate and under
our under modern
conditions, would throw America back to the 1890's.
The best society
WAISTLINE PERSEVERES:
If a section of the working class holds people in
contempt it is
because
this section holds itself in contempt and cannot sense
its body and
heart beat.
I am aware that all of this sounds very mysterious
and light headed
but this
is only because you are
WAISTLINE :
There are no more reforms left in capitalism because
it is not
possible to reformulate the relations between and
within the existing
classes
without changing the property relations. The concept
of the most
poverty stricken
and destitute of the proletarian masses is no
WAISTLINE:
This is not a theoretically convincing argument.
Actually I am not
rich
MY COMMENTS:
Theoretically convincing arguments is what WAISTLINE
wants. Perhaps something like the deprived
convincing arguments which he deposits. I rather
like posturing my idiosyncrasies against his,
WAISTLINE:
Our dispute is over our vision of communism and why
communists must dig
into
the most poverty stricken and destitute of the
proletarian masses and
view
strategy from this lens.
MY COMMENTS:
Besides your revisionism, our dispute is about
everything that we are disputing about.
When I'm good and ready.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see that your brain
is now in an ebb state on the matter.
The mighty working class will indeed determine the
course of history. I believe that, and that's why
I'm
a Marxist.
Comment
What about the Foster
WAISTLINE'S ANARCHISM:
I make it perfectly clear that the state has no
business sticking its
nose
into the production process. We do not need a state
demanding that a
government
bureau be set up to count widgets. The dictatorship
of the proletariat
in
America will not have a bureau or
WAISTLINE:
'Actually, I was still wondering about me being rich,
which you wrote
and
really would like for you to locate my money at a
finders fee of 50% .
. . .
please help me.'
MY COMMENTS:
The same applies to the industrial proletariat which
still earns less than you ever admitted
1 - 100 of 468 matches
Mail list logo
