Subject: Re: [masq] ipchains - proper forum?
Is discussing ipchains on this list appropriate since it appears as if
ipchains is pretty much going to replace ipmasq as we currently know it?
IPCHAINS will only replace IPFWADM. MASQ is still a function of
the Linux kernel.
So.. YES..
I would like to to start putting in firewall rules to block ANYTHING
from certain domain names. For instance, I'll often get hit from
(something).sp.mandic.com.br, but there doesn't seem to be a contiguous
IP range. I think I figured out that I need
ipfwadm -I -a deny -S mandic.com.br
I posted a similar message recently to a Usenet group. Hopefully,
you guys will know better:
I got my Austin Roadrunner service up and running with Linux
(Redhat 5.1 + kernel 1.2.126) masquerading a RFC1918 network.
Surprisingly, there is currently no need for the authorization
process in my
Greetings everyone
I've got a public IP address for my gateway. The gateway is doing IP
masquerading for my entire LAN. The gateway also acts as a firewall.
If I take down the firewall (i.e. flush all Input and Output rules) and
just leave masquerading running I can traceroute from the LAN.
Hi,
I hope this is not off-topic. If it is, please tell me where it would be
more approriate.
I got a question concerning the transparent proxy support in the Linux
kernel.
As I understand it the Linux box will catch any outgoing request to a
specific port and redirect it to a local port. (If
David Kramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to to start putting in firewall rules to block ANYTHING
from certain domain names.
What sounds simple on the surface is often not-so-simple underneath.
For instance, I'll often get hit from (something).sp.mandic.com.br,
but there doesn't
I have someone flood pinging my IPMasq PC from what I believe to be spoofed
IP addresses. I would like to stop this. Is there any way to stop an IPMasq
PC from responding to pings and/or spoofed packets?
Try this before your implict IPFWADM deny/reject:
$extif is the NAME of your internet
So I think I finally dug up what I needed, but I wanted to
bounce it off to see if this is right.
In the kernel, there is a defined start and length for
the ip_masq ports (61000 + 4096) by default. Am
I current to assume that I can just permit this range
of ports in arbitrarily and let the masq
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone knows where I can get
additional documentation on VPN and Linux aside
from the VPN Howto.
Thanks,
Dave C.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
I'm using bitchx or any irc client on a client system (win95) but when I
try to connect to any IRC server I get an error message saying that I'm
not running a ident rfc14?? server which I'm 100% shure that win95 is
running. I can telnet to the ipmasq server and use BitchX there and it
will work.
10 matches
Mail list logo