>I found in writing firewall rules, its easier to do a "blanket" deny >policy, (so you get all your bases), then only do "accept" for those >services you want to allow. Why not a blanket REJECT? --David .----------------------------------------------------------------------------. | David A. Ranch - Linux/Networking/PC hardware [EMAIL PROTECTED] | !---- ----! `----- For more detailed info, see http://www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~dranch -----' --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For daily digest info, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [masq] Limitation problem.... Marc Cassuto
- Re: [masq] Limitation problem.... Marc Cassuto
- [masq] How a firewall works... David A. Ranch
- Re: [masq] How a firewall works... Fred Viles
- Re: [masq] [masq] How a firewall wo... David A. Ranch
- Re: [masq] How a firewall works... Lourdes A Jones
- Re: [masq] How a firewall works... David A. Ranch
- Re: [masq] How a firewall works... Lourdes A Jones
- Re: [masq] [masq] How a firewall wo... Michael Casteel
- Re: [masq] How a firewall works... David A. Ranch
- Re: [masq] How a firewall works... David A. Ranch
- Re: [masq] How a firewall works... Lourdes A Jones
- Re: [masq] Limitation problem.... Lourdes A Jones
- [masq] Interesting Loop back.... Marc Cassuto
- Re: [masq] Interesting Loop back...... Ovidiu Motz
- Re: [masq] Interesting Loop back...... David A. Ranch
- [Masq] Re: [masq] Interesting Loop ... Marc Cassuto
- Re: [masq] Limitation problem.... Fuzzy Fox
- Re: [masq] Limitation problem.... Marc Cassuto
- Re: [masq] Limitation problem.... David A. Ranch