Please keep the list in the loop: adding it again.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:16, Alberto Soto alberto.s...@lmsintl.com wrote:
Hi Sandro,
I have
$ python -c import matplotlib as mpl ; print mpl.__version__
0.98.5.2
Installed and am running PyQt v4.4.3 because I am forced to rest on
Python
Hi Sandro,
I have
$ python -c import matplotlib as mpl ; print mpl.__version__
0.98.5.2
Installed and am running PyQt v4.4.3 because I am forced to rest on
Python 2.5
I will try installing 0.98.5.3 and see if that makes a difference.
I have seen the same problem in a Unix installation, I
Hi again,
I have just installed matplotlib 0.98.5.3 and the problem seems to have
been fixed. But the movements are a lot slower though, (probably because
a lot more paint events were added?).
Thanks for the help.
-Original Message-
From: matrixh...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Daniel nos...@drlock.com wrote:
Hello All,
I have attached a patch that updates backend_fltkagg.py to use the new
Transform APIs for 0.98.0
(http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/api/api_changes.html#notes-about-the-transforms-refactoring).
Without these changes,
Jae-Joon,
I just saw your curvelinear grid support fall into SVN. Very
impressive! We actually may have a use for it here at Space Telescope
for drawing World Coordinate System (WCS) plots.
One quick question though -- it seems that this functionality is
completely independent of the
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Michael Droettboom md...@stsci.edu wrote:
Jae-Joon,
I just saw your curvelinear grid support fall into SVN. Very
impressive! We actually may have a use for it here at Space Telescope
for drawing World Coordinate System (WCS) plots.
I am getting an exception
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Michael Droettboom md...@stsci.edu wrote:
Jae-Joon,
I just saw your curvelinear grid support fall into SVN. Very
impressive! We actually may have a use for it here at Space Telescope
for drawing World Coordinate System (WCS) plots.
Well, the WCS support is
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:22 AM, John Hunter jdh2...@gmail.com wrote:
so we may want to special case the code to handle 0.0, 0.0 as inputs.
Thanks a lot for tracking this down!
It would be best if my algorithm does not produce such a case, but
evidently it does. Yes, I'll put some code to treat
