Re: Convergence problem in runpf for contingency

2014-11-04 Thread ckbeee
 

Dear Jose L. Marin and Dr.Zimmerman, 

Thank you Mr.Jose L. Marin for your detailed explanations. I also thank
Dr.Zimmerman for giving hint in using find_islands() function. 

Regards, 

Babulal 

On 31-10-2014 18:15, Jose Luis Marin wrote: 

 Hello Babulal,
 
 I believe that the problem is that MATPOWER does not automatically remove 
 islands when running a powerflow. Each of the three contingencies you list 
 happen to isolate a bus, therefore the network needs to be reduced prior to 
 the call to runpf (Ray -- please correct me if I'm wrong).
 
 You can use extract_islands() for this: 
 
 mpc = loadcase(IEEE30_Conting9_11)
 
 mpc = 
 
 version: '2'
 baseMVA: 100
 bus: [30x13 double]
 gen: [6x25 double]
 branch: [41x13 double]
 
 mpc_reduced = extract_islands(mpc, 1)
 
 mpc_reduced = 
 
 version: '2'
 baseMVA: 100
 bus: [29x13 double]
 gen: [5x25 double]
 branch: [40x13 double]
 
 Running runpf() on this reduced case works OK for the contingencies you list. 
 
 -- Jose L. Marin 
 Gridquant España SL 
 Grupo AIA 
 
 On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 9:41 AM, ckbeee ckb...@tce.edu wrote:
 
 Dear Dr.Zimmerman,
 
 When I perform the power flow for the following contingency in case_ieee30.m 
 system, MATPOWER experiences numerical instability.
 
 1. Line number 13 (Connected between buses 9-11)
 2. Line number 16 (Connected between buses 13-12)
 3. Line number 34 (Connected between buses 25-26)
 
 It means no solution exist for these contingencies. It does not give results 
 for OPF also.
 
 Thanks in advance.
 
 Regards,
 Babulal
 -- 
 
 Assistant Professor
 Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering
 Thiagarajar College of Engineering.
 Madurai-625 015. Tamilnadu. India.
 Mobile: +91 98439 17258 [1]
 ck_babu...@gmail.com
 
 --
 This email was sent using TCEMail Service.
 Thiagarajar College of Engineering
 Madurai-625 015, India

-- 

Assistant Professor
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Thiagarajar College of Engineering.
Madurai-625 015. Tamilnadu. India.
Mobile: +91 98439 17258
ck_babu...@gmail.com

 -- This
email was sent using TCEMail Service. Thiagarajar College of Engineering
Madurai-625 015, India 

Links:
--
[1] tel:%2B91%2098439%2017258


Re: Convergence problem in runpf for contingency

2014-10-31 Thread Jose Luis Marin
Hello Babulal,

I believe that the problem is that MATPOWER does not automatically remove
islands when running a powerflow.  Each of the three contingencies you list
happen to isolate a bus, therefore the network needs to be reduced prior to
the call to runpf (Ray -- please correct me if I'm wrong).

You can use extract_islands() for this:

 mpc = loadcase(IEEE30_Conting9_11)

mpc =

version: '2'
baseMVA: 100
bus: [30x13 double]
gen: [6x25 double]
 branch: [41x13 double]

 mpc_reduced = extract_islands(mpc, 1)

mpc_reduced =

version: '2'
baseMVA: 100
bus: [29x13 double]
gen: [5x25 double]
 branch: [40x13 double]


Running runpf() on this reduced case works OK for the contingencies you
list.

-- 
Jose L. Marin
Gridquant España SL
Grupo AIA



On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 9:41 AM, ckbeee ckb...@tce.edu wrote:


 Dear Dr.Zimmerman,

 When I perform the power flow for the following contingency in
 case_ieee30.m system, MATPOWER experiences numerical instability.

 1. Line number 13 (Connected between buses 9-11)
 2. Line number 16 (Connected between buses 13-12)
 3. Line number 34 (Connected between buses 25-26)

 It means no solution exist for these contingencies. It does not give
 results for OPF also.

 Thanks in advance.

 Regards,
 Babulal
 --
 
 Assistant Professor
 Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering
 Thiagarajar College of Engineering.
 Madurai-625 015. Tamilnadu. India.
 Mobile: +91 98439 17258
 ck_babu...@gmail.com
 
 --
 This email was sent using TCEMail Service.
 Thiagarajar College of Engineering
 Madurai-625 015, India