[Mav-user] a new view

2004-08-27 Thread Joseph Dane
I recently had reason to develop a new view type for Maverick, and wonder if there might be any interest in it. If so, perhaps I can contribute it back to the project. The problem: I needed a very simple X?HTML template system. It had to be something that, however, complicated under the hood,

Re: [Mav-user] a new view

2004-08-27 Thread Doug Kirk
Hmmm...I don't want to rain on any parades, but I'm just wondering why you didn't want to use Velocity, as it accomplishes the same thing and it's already written and well-supported? --doug --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic

RE: [Mav-user] opt-freemarker

2004-08-27 Thread Schnitzer, Jeff
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:mav-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eelco Hillenius So, I hereby vote +1 for write access for Ed Ward. What about the other developers? I'm +1. (I just got back from a long vacation, it'll take me a while to catch up on these threads) Jeff

Re: [Mav-user] a new view

2004-08-27 Thread Eelco Hillenius
It sound nice. I use Velocity mostly, and am still very content with it. But, Velocity would not be useful for you as it does not provide you with valid XML source files. Just wondering... what kind of stuff are you doing with these XML input files? Eelco - Original Message - From:

Re: [Mav-user] a new view

2004-08-27 Thread Joseph Dane
Doug Kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hmmm...I don't want to rain on any parades, but I'm just wondering why you didn't want to use Velocity, as it accomplishes the same thing and it's already written and well-supported? I do use Velocity, and am happy with it in the contexts in which I use it.