Well this is indeed a blast from the past!
You seem to be missing jdom.jar from your classpath as well. There
will be a version in your maverick distribution, or you can find the
latest version here: http://www.jdom.org/
Also, sometimes you can have class path issues if you have duplicate
Are there more logs you can share? Anything that points to what class it is
trying to locate? I don't work with Tomcat often, but remember that
sometimes things get scattered throughout multiple logs.
Eelco
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Angela Day akc...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks for the
Any chance you might have another maverick jar in your class path somehow?
Eelco
--
___
%(real_name)s mailing list
%(real_name)s...@%(host_name)s
It's hardly active, but the source code is stable and quite
accessible, and there are still a few people monitoring this list.
Maverick is a nice pick if you like it's composition pattern (using
transforms, which is kind of the inverse of, say, Struts' tiles), and
I think the code is well
You don't really need a specific plugin to get that working; it's just
a matter of configuring Maverick as is described here:
http://mav.sourceforge.net/maverick-manual.html#N10167
You can get separate plugins for Velocity in Eclipse
(http://veloedit.sourceforge.net/ or
Do you have jdom in your class path (WEB-INF/lib)?
Eelco
On 2/24/06, V Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI all I am using Tomcat5.0,eclipse.And I am trying run maverick example its
giving following error.If some one will give solution for this it will be
great.
Thanks Regards
Venkat.
Is the setting controller-factory which is described at
http://mav.sourceforge.net/maverick-manual.html of any use?
Eelco
On 1/31/06, wally bowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Can someone help me figure out how to let Spring be
the factory to instantiate the command controller
objects
Here http://mav.sourceforge.net/maverick-manual.html and here
http://www.theserverside.com/articles/article.tss?l=Maverick. There is
no book to my knowledge, though it is referenced in a couple of books.
Eelco
On 9/30/05, Lorenzo Jiménez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where I can find small step by
Devs,
There has been hardly any use of this list. There have been a couple
of feature requests/ bug reports though. As it doesn't look like any
of the current committers is going to attend them (I am too involved
with Wicket to support Maverick).
Travis Reeder would to apply a fix for the JDOM
No objections here.
Regards,
Eelco
What are the thoughts of updating the jdom dependency of maverick? If
there are no objections I will do the updates and do a 2.2.4 release.
-- Mike
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read
Yiannis,
You can use FormBeanCtrlBase for thread safe controllers. It won't solve
your problem though, as an instance of this will be created with every
request (instead of the session you seem to be looking for). Why not
just use an object to hold your questionaire data and keep it in the
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eelco
Hillenius
Sent: 10 November 2004 14:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mav-user] Need recommendation as to what controller to
use..
Yiannis,
You can use FormBeanCtrlBase for thread safe controllers. It won't solve
your
Haha, really... what's so wrong about starting another technology? I
actually think it is one of the strongest points of the Java communtiy that
there are so many. Gives people choice (after all, why should Maverick have
been started when there was Struts), and the competition makes open source
It sound nice. I use Velocity mostly, and am still very content with it.
But, Velocity would not be useful for you as it does not provide you with
valid XML source files. Just wondering... what kind of stuff are you doing
with these XML input files?
Eelco
- Original Message -
From:
Most servlet containers support hot-deployments. You should check out the
usergroups/ documentation of the servlet containers you are considering for
these features.
My experience with various servlet containers (like Resin, Jetty, Tomcat,
Websphere) is that it works allright if you play by the
I created Maverick 2.2.3 with Ed's patch. I also created Optional
Freemarker; maintenance for this packge should be done by somebody else.
Eelco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eelco Hillenius
Sent: zaterdag 7 augustus 2004 9:48
found time to look at
the updates to DocumentView?
Ed
- Original Message -
From: Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 7:27 PM
Subject: RE: [Mav-user] opt-freemarker
Sounds interesting. I am very busy with other things at the moment though
Sounds interesting. I am very busy with other things at the moment though,
but I'll try to look at it next week.
Cheers,
Eelco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Ward
Sent: donderdag 22 juli 2004 4:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
to find the source files, but you
can do chaining just like this:
command name=cmd1
controller class=MyCtrl2 /
view path=myview.vm /
/command
command name=cmd2
controller class=MyCtrl2 /
view path=cmd1.m / !-- this chains cmd2 to cmd1 (or should you say
reverse) --
/command
Eelco
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eelco Hillenius
Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2004 3:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mav-user] Eclipse plugin
[...]
Now about the pluggable controller factory. Actually that has been the only
functionality in Maverick I found lacking myself
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eelco Hillenius
Sent: zondag 27 juni 2004 11:28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Mav-user] Eclipse plugin
I'll look into making the controller factory pluggable today - if the
original authors do not mind
factory and an
example of how it can be used, and I also added a short description of
Baritus.
Hope everyone has fun with it, and does not have too much trouble with
switching to commons logging (probably not judging from the list traffic).
Eelco Hillenius
1. It sounds to me that you do not need a lot of different commands, but
possibly a lot of different views... If you need to do some Java action on a
specific request, you can do that with a controller. You will (probably) at
least end up with the number commands that you need to have controller
-
From: Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm kind of working on an Eclipse plugin for Maverick. After making
some
contributions for the Jetty Plugin (http://spindle.sourceforge.net) I
decided that now is the time to really learn how to write them
properly.
Right now, the plugin does some pretty
Actually it is not. You can still use Log4J as you did, but there's one more
lib living in you app space now - if it wasn't allready there because a lot
of project have a dependency on it.
I really like Log4J and never used other logging systems when I did not have
to. I do understand users who
Hi all,
I just commited the proposed changes to replace Log4J with Commons Logging.
Jeff, could you change the rights on the site documents (index.html and
maverick-manual.html)? They are only writeable for the owner... and that's
you 8)
All:
any additional changes/ fixes I should make? Any
-user] Site permissions and release plan
I've reset the permissions on all the web content files.
I can't think of any other changes... feel free to propose a release.
Thanks!
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:mav-user-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eelco
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:mav-user-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eelco Hillenius
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 2:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Mav-user] VOTE: Make Eelco a committer
Cheers people.
Could someone give me a note when I have the rights?
-Original Message
Cheers people.
Could someone give me a note when I have the rights?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jim moore
Sent: woensdag 2 juni 2004 11:52
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Mav-user] VOTE: Make Eelco a committer
+1
-Original
That's what I proposed about a year ago, and I still am for replacing Log4J
by Commons Logging.
Eelco
- Original Message -
From: Jon Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 3:56 PM
Subject: [Mav-user] Use Apache Commons Logging instead of log4j
What
Cool. The company I work for mostly uses Maverick/ Velocity (or actually my
OSS framework extension Baritus http://baritus.sourceforge.net) for our
projects. I find it especialy striking how happy newbies are with Velocity
compared to JSP.
About your framework... did you learn anything/ make any
Hi all,
There's a new web framework on the block that extends (not alters) Maverick.
It provides services for fine-grained and extensible population and
validation and an interceptor mechanism. A bit like a boosted version of
FormBeanUser.
Interested? Take a look at:
Did you look at the logs in {tomcat-home}/logs? I suspect a classpath
error.
Eelco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michiel
Verhoef
Sent: maandag 11 augustus 2003 11:05
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [Mav-user] Maverick webapp not
Thanks for thanking ;)
I was wondering if anyone took a closer look at the example, and if
anyone has any comments.
I kind of forgot to explain my goals behind the framework. I do not like
the available validation frameworks because in those frameworks you have
to put type information etc. in a
]
Subject: RE: [Mav-user] new user
Hi Eelco,
I would be interested in seeing your demo as I have recently become
interested in Maverick. Could you send it to me if you don't include it
on the Maverick website ?
Many thanks, Thomas.
-Original Message-
From: Eelco Hillenius [mailto:[EMAIL
snip
Hi Eelco,
I would be interested in seeing your demo as I have recently become
interested in Maverick. Could you send it to me if you don't include it
on the Maverick website ?
Many thanks, Thomas.
/snip
I am a Maverick user, not a committer, so it will not be included on the
Maverick
comments, please drop me a line.
As I said earlier, you can build it (and get the dependencies) with
maven. Please read the README file first.
Hope you have fun with it,
Eelco Hillenius
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET
I am hooked to Maverick as well. I used it for several projects, and
just begun using it for a large scale project. For this project I am
responsible for education as well, and for this purpose I developped a
small example webapp. It uses Velocity for the views and provides a
small additional
For what it's worth, here are my thoughts...
I never gave Sitemesh a serious try, though maybe I should as it seems to be
very popular lately. I must say that I think it does not give me much
confidence looking at the release notes and looking at the pace that is
worked on the project (which does
I have to object to that (and I am not one of the maintainers). I think the
documentation is good, taking the scope of the project and the provided
examples in account. Moreover, I think it is one of the better written OSS
Java projects around where it comes to clearity of design and code. In
I'm allways in for that, though I'm not involved in the project (just a
user). But I figure, the more readers the better your result can be?
Eelco
- Original Message -
From: Kimberley Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mav-User (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 12:27 AM
... I
must be missing something!
Eelco
- Original Message -
From: Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Mav-user] Internationalization
So far, I did not have special reqs for internationalization, so the
default
i18n
or wrappers (like Double instead of double). That works fine with BeanUtils
as well...
Eelco
- Original Message -
From: Kimberley Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 3:54 PM
Subject: [Mav-user] FW: Newbie: Setters appear to not being called...
of :
public void setTerm(string term) {
this.term = stringToDouble(value);
}
you can just have:
public void setTerm(double term) {
this.term = term;
}
--jim
- Original Message -
From: Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003
Hi all,
When using the latest version of FOP (which is the only version that behaves
really well with my system) I came across some API changes that breaks
FopTransform from maverick-opt-fop.
1. Options are now only supported for command line operations;
2. The Avalon logger now must be set with
IMHO a sensible strategy of developping apps is to first focus on the
behavoir and after that focus on performance issues. That does not mean that
it is wrong to take performance issues in account in an early stage, but
just do not let it overtake the main focus of your project.
In my experience
at least on the same level
as its predecessor. Expecially knowing how good PHP- and
Perl-based solutions could be in simple applications.)
Thanks,
Valeri
---
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:41:51
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
IMHO a sensible strategy of developping apps is to first focus on the
behavoir
!
Eelco
- Original Message -
From: Schnitzer, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 4:10 AM
Subject: RE: [Mav-user] reusable controllers and session objects
From: Eelco Hillenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Second side note: GC can give you
You should do stuff like this entirely different. Learn about it at:
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/Books/javaserverpages/servlets_javas
erver/servlets_javaserver05.pdf
Eelco Hillenius
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jonas Van
If you want to use property test, TestController should have that property:
public class TestController extends ThrowawayBean2
{
private String name;
private String test;
public String getname() { return this.name; }
public void setname(String s) { this.name = s; }
public String
of the model just before leaving the
controller it has been set properly, but from the JSP there is nothing...
Stephan.
-Original Message-
From: Eelco Hillenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: donderdag 20 februari 2003 12:09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Mav-user] Model doesn't get
Do you know about the JavaBean spec? This is pretty standard Java stuff...
Eelco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stephan Visser
Sent: donderdag 20 februari 2003 12:54
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Mav-user] Model doesn't get
Message-
From: Vladimir Yusseem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: donderdag 20 februari 2003 19:49
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mav-user] Model doesn't get initialized?
Also Java seemed to be case sensetive ... :-).
- Original Message -
From: Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL
base class. A contract (command requires
certain variables to be available) couples loosely. But, hey... the nice
thing about Maverik is that you can decide yourself!
Thanks for the quick response,
Eelco Hillenius
- Original Message -
From: Schnitzer, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
...)
I think the author is right as well when he says that MVC does not solve all
your problems (surprise, surprise). But it *does* give the community a nice
proven method to make our webapps a bit less messy.
Eelco Hillenius
- Original Message -
From: Roman Petrov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
ry well for me, and allthough I can do
this ina number different ways without chaining, this is what I like best.
The danger would be that you (or I for that matter) would end up making a
one-size-fits-all comand before you know it. But... if you think there's a much
better way of doing this... I'm all
for internal use (which is allways the case
if command1 calls command2?).
Well, what do you all think?
Cheers,
Eelco Hillenius
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http
57 matches
Mail list logo
