I recently had reason to develop a new view type for Maverick, and
wonder if there might be any interest in it. If so, perhaps I can
contribute it back to the project.
The problem: I needed a very simple X?HTML template system. It had to
be something that, however, complicated under the hood,
Schnitzer, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Velocity produces text that must be parsed to perform XSLT transforms.
This new approach starts immediately with SAX events. Unlike a
hypothetical saxify, it doesn't require fully navigating the source
object graph. Cool.
yes, I think so too. in
developpers think harder about their added value in open source space.
Eelco
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Dane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Mav-user] a new view
Doug Kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmmm...I don't want
I recently had reason to develop a new view type for Maverick, and
wonder if there might be any interest in it. If so, perhaps I can
contribute it back to the project.
The problem: I needed a very simple X?HTML template system. It had to
be something that, however, complicated under the hood,
Hmmm...I don't want to rain on any parades, but I'm just wondering why
you didn't want to use Velocity, as it accomplishes the same thing and
it's already written and well-supported?
--doug
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic
: Joseph Dane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 8:21 PM
Subject: [Mav-user] a new view
I recently had reason to develop a new view type for Maverick, and
wonder if there might be any interest in it. If so, perhaps I can
contribute it back to the project
Doug Kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmmm...I don't want to rain on any parades, but I'm just wondering why
you didn't want to use Velocity, as it accomplishes the same thing and
it's already written and well-supported?
I do use Velocity, and am happy with it in the contexts in which I
use it.
