Done, and done.
- Original Message -
From: "Schnitzer, Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 6:21 PM
Subject: RE: [Mav-user] Params w/child nodes
I'm a +1 on this too.
Scott or Jim, can you make the change? Unfortunately I do not yet have
'net
Roy,
I think I understand where you are coming from, but what would you want to
represent the xml as? What types of Object(s)?
Named objects? With named properties for each child and attribute? That
sounds a little complicated. There are tools out there that will do that
tho...
We are already u
What version of Xalan/Xerces are you using?
What do your lazy init'd collections look like?
It is possible that the xml parser is reading more data than it should...
but it really depends on the XSL/XML used.
I need more information, or an simpler example to see what is going on here.
- Ori
Yeah, This is about right. It actually loads the new version of config
before releasing the existing copy. This is so the site will work until the
new config is loaded. You don't want to drop the old stuff until the new
config is validated and loaded.
It looks something like this in code.
try{
The unfortunate side affect of doing this entity inclusion is that the
partX.xml files are xml fragments and not well-formed documents. XLink
provides a better alternative but is implementation bound. Not all xml
processors/parsers support the XLink syntax.
You could also use the transformation of
ments. For
clarity I would recommend renaming the entity inclusion files to something
other than xml as they are not valid xml documents (in some cases).
Yurii, I hope one of these options will work for you.
- Original Message -
From: "Schnitzer, Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&g
If you want to make an XSD (XML Schema) definition you can create an "any"
schema element to allow anything within an element. That is how you can
allow arbitrary xml within the schema definition.
I'm pretty sure you can do something very similar in a DTD.
- Original Message -
From: Schn
Yeah, sorry I haven't been more active here. Thanks Jeff.
I have kinda jumped back to the ms camp and .Net stuff. I've been very
active in NAnt, a .Net (Ant-like) build tool, and various other open source
projects. If anyone else is interested in that kinda stuff, please come on
by...
It basicall
Yep. JDom is just used to the load the config file. Not as the default
processor for any other transformations or xml operations.
> > I'd like not to use JDom
>
> JDom is tightly integrated with Maverick. I didn't write the original
code,
> but the code that I've read looks like it uses JDom very
Under NTFS you can use junctions. They are very much like hard links in unix
and are only allowed within a volume.
http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/source/misc.shtml#junction
Just an option...
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Chun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wedn
+1; Absolutely!
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET
+1
- Original Message -
From: "Schnitzer, Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 11:34 AM
Subject: [Mav-user] PROPOSAL: Add Ted Husted as committer
I propose adding Ted Husted as a committer to Maverick. His resume
precedes him; he's one of th
I'd be interested in seeing it, and we can add a link to the source in the
docs if you would like. The more samples, the better.
I'm always amazed at home much technology we can squeeze in an application
for such a little thing like a soccer team. I remember when I was kid all we
did was xerox sc
+1. I've been traveling through California the last few days.
- Original Message -
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Mav-user] PROPOSAL: Move java packaging to net.sf.mav.*
> Mike Moulton wrote:
> >
I have to agree with Ted on this one. It is a little longer, but much
clearer, when we use .opt.
- Original Message -
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Mav-user] PROPOSAL: Add Ted Husted as committer
>
We are not, we never finished getting the exec permissions setup on cvs.
There was a request sent to sf.net, but I never followed up like I should
have :(
- Original Message -
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[snip]
> * Is the CVS list broken? Are we using the syncmail mail script?
Sure. +1 to changing package names and moving to commons logging, or java
1.4 logging (I think we may have some problems running on 1.3 anyway, or was
it just some of our dependencies...).
It would probably be good to roll any good questions that have come up on
the list into the faq, and document
+1 on the patch.
I, as well as others, could commit the changes and then we can put together
a new release.
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Newton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[snip]
>
> Do we have a volunteer to do the conversion?
I've looked at the code enough in the last week to feel comfor
+1, then he can put the link up :)
- Original Message -
From: "Schnitzer, Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I propose making Eelco a committer.
I'm +1.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.
>From Windows to Linux
What about using the config file to help navigate to the controller classes.
It would be nice to be able to see your project space in terms of the
commands and controllers, and then to navigate to the source files
associated with them. Just an idea...
Also, if you are using xsl stuff (with domify)
+1
- Original Message -
I'm +1 for giving him commit rights. Can we have a vote please?
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsf
Hey Barrie,
1.) Yes, The model that is returned from the controller is used as the
input to the XSL transformation. So... if have some XML, in either DOM
(Node) or stream (InputStream) or Reader form, you can return it as the
model.
public class MyController extends ControllerProtected
{
...
In the current version, 1.0.1, if you pass an existing DOM Node in as
the model it is passed thru to the pipeline as is.
So if your controller returns a DOM Node as the model, and you have a
configuration something like below, then everything will work just fine.
There are examples in the core dist, and the optional ones. Take a look at
maverick\examples\friendbook-jsp\WEB-INF\maverick.xml for an example.
The format is still being worked on, as is a more comprehensive examples for
the docs. :)
Here is a list of links into the cvs viewer on soureforge if
Things are a changing... We will definitely need to compile a FAQ for this
stuff. :)
Nope, no need for domify anymore. In the 1.x framework is made sense (just
kinda fit) to have domify wrap the XML stuff. In 2.x we support
transformations of types other than xslt, and from a domify source, so we
The new way of doing this with XSLT transformations is to use the
lazy-load-templates param; defined with the module xml information of
the factory. Here is an example:
Note: This affects all the templates loaded of this type. An interesting
th
Please see the mail I just sent with the subject "preloadTemplates". The
sample xml answers this question also.
-Original Message-
Subject: [Mav-user] mavMaxTransforms
how does mavMaxTransforms work in version 2? i believe the name of this
attribute has been changed, made flexible, or
Sorry, to get this kind of functionality, or supply any additional
params to the factories, you need to add the module xml for those
view/transformation factories.
However, in the faqs/docs, there will be a section devoted to these
types of questions :)
The default for this value in the factory
Before I go into a discussion of the why... Let me ask this:
Should there be an option to have global views work they used to? (I was
thinking along the lines of a param for the config file to switch modes)
-
Jeff and I spent a good amount of time discussing this since the 1.0
r
e
just one of these groups and you've got the elegance of 1.0. make a
whole
bunch of them and you can get granularity as high as you please.
you end up with a "command-set" rather than a single "command" being
self-contained.
isn't this a good way to scope views
Yes, I believe this is different than the way the 1.0 version work (by
using preloadTemplates). In 1.0, this indicated that the template should
be loaded from the file system on each request, instead of cached. This
made it read the file on each request.
Jim, Is that what you were expecting?
---
Here is a step-by-step for getting the examples working with the Sun JDK
1.4 and Tomcat 4.0.3 (JDK 1.4 dist.) on WinXP Pro.
1.) Install the 1.4 JDK.
2.) Install Tomcat, make sure it is working.
(For future ref tc = Tomcat install dir)
Note: I used the "jakarta-tomcat-4.0.3-LE-jdk14.zip" dist. E
Yes you can. But once you have set the mime type, or content type, I
don't believe you can change it again. (Just a warning...)
In Maverick 2.0 there is a null view type. It has been added to source
control, but not into a distribution yet. So you will need to get it
from cvs and build it, to use
I think there is a better place than the controller's constructor to do
that. Because the controller creates the model, you do actually have a
place to implement your own "setup()", outside the constructor. But as
you have pointed out, figuring out when the model is done is a lot
harder.
The cont
This is a configuration problem. It is a "ConfigException" to be exact.
In the future, please post the full stack trace; this would have shown
that is it was generated from Dispatch.reloadConfig().
Please post your maverick.xml and details about what version of maverick
you are using. It is a l
Messenger at this
email address. In addition I also have accounts on AOL, Yahoo, ICQ and
Jabber if that works better.
-Original Message-
From: Jordan C N Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 8:31 AM
To: Scott Hernandez; 'maverick'
Subject: RE: [Mav-user] Uknown
Please read this email from the archives for
help.
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=110677
- Original Message -
From:
Jordan C N
Chong
To: maverick
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:16
AM
Subject: [Mav-user] What does this error
mean?
Hi,
This can all be done in javascript on the client, if you want to use
scripting. It really only has to do with what html you generate from the
view, and nothing on the server side.
If you want to use an anchor, instead of a button, a common trick is to
use a unique (if you want every link to have
Here is a thread from the castor-dev list. The subject is "Feature
Comparison Chart Torque, Castor, JRF", need I say more:)
http://www.mail-archive.com/castor-dev@exolab.org/msg03850.html
As for Kodo, I don't know.
Here is a simple javaworld article about persistence.
http://www.javaworld.com/j
+1
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Schnitzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I've been thinking a bit about a little paradigm shift; instead of
passing all the http objects into the Controller.perform(), I would pass
a MaverickContext (or something like that) object which has methods to
obtain al
Yes, please send what you have to this list. If it is really big > 200k (?)
please just announce it and someone will contact you for the patch files.
We are pretty laid back here, don't worry about etiquette. We try not to :)
Roy, you might want to check that you are on the list. I've cc'd you b
41 matches
Mail list logo
