Hi Leonard,
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 20:44 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
Hi Jindrich,
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 16:07 +0100, Jindrich Novy wrote:
the current RPM vfs allows to see RPM package requires/provides and
obsoletes but lacks an implementation of conflicts. The attached patch
Hi Jindrich,
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 10:23 +0100, Jindrich Novy wrote:
sure :) here we go with the patched trpm vfs as well. rpms fortunately
doesn't need any changes.
Yes, of course, trpm. Committed. Thanks.
Leonard.
--
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research
Hello Andrew,
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 12:04 +, Andrew V. Samoilov wrote:
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #18042 (project mc):
Do I understand correctly that a port number *can* be combined with C _or_
r?
No. Look at utilvfs.c:vfs_split_url().
No one syntax change. Only undocumented behaviour
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
Hello Andrew,
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 12:04 +, Andrew V. Samoilov wrote:
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #18042 (project mc):
Do I understand correctly that a port number *can* be combined with C _or_
r?
No. Look at utilvfs.c:vfs_split_url().
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 11:45 +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
IMO, if you intend to work on a fix you should follow the
suggestion of the bash maintainer to switch over to using
printf - not only for bash but for all cases. Of course
a fallback
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Yes, I read that comment. However I'm not prepared to start breaking the
functionality of shells that I never use.
This is a rather strange statement. As a developer you should try to
go beyond your personal
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Yes, I read that comment. However I'm not prepared to start breaking the
functionality of shells that I never use.
This is a rather strange statement. As a developer
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Yes, I read that comment. However I'm not prepared to start breaking the
functionality of shells that I never use.
This is
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Ok. Since I am not native english speaker I cannot judge whether
he is recommending it or not. In any case I can see why keeping
the old behaviour of 'echo' is important for large scripts, however
what we have in MC is nothing as big. I just feel that
Hello Pavel,
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 13:27 +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Yes, I read that comment. However I'm not prepared to start breaking the
functionality of shells that I never use.
This is a rather strange statement. As a developer you should try to
go beyond your personal preferences.
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Ok. Since I am not native english speaker I cannot judge whether
he is recommending it or not. In any case I can see why keeping
the old behaviour of 'echo' is important for large scripts, however
what we have
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 14:55 +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
I am beginning
to wonther whether do we really want to escape the characters
using echo or printf.
For embedded backslashes etc. I suppose we do.
Leonard.
--
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research
Hello Thomas,
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 07:51 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
Before rushing off to change things to
accommodate bash 3.2, it's worth checking if the fix will work with other
shells.
I'm not quite sure which fix you are referring to here. The temporary
hack I send to this list
Hello Pavel,
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 13:20 +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
IMO, it would be better if MC pops up an url specific dialog for
each vfs if necessary so that the user could finer tune the connection. I
think this would also help to add support for per connection settings i.e.
use
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 15:15 +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
The printf solution wouldn't be that hard to implement in fact. It
may be even simpler. I can look at it.
That would be nice. Thank you.
Leonard.
--
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 13:20 +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
IMO, it would be better if MC pops up an url specific dialog for
each vfs if necessary so that the user could finer tune the connection. I
think this would also help to add support for per
Hello Pavel,
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 15:26 +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
This is not a task which requires tremendous efforts. It is just a matter
of defining what we want to do and how we want to do it. And in the
meantime there is an easy workaround - just set the port in ~/.ssh/config.
Yes,
Hello Thomas,
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 08:38 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
One problem is that the user has to keep track (for the non-automatic
workarounds) of the bash version.
No. Default setting of 0 (or unset) of bash_octal_digits would fallback
to option 1, which works for bash = 2.05b (in
Hello,
could this patch please be committed to cvs (I am attaching it for your
convenience)?
BTW, how this patch works when two mc are running? If I search in 1st mc,
then in 2nd mc, and then again in 1st mc, what will I get - last text from
1st or 2nd? I'd prefer from 1st, i.e. different mc
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Nerijus Baliunas wrote:
Hello,
could this patch please be committed to cvs (I am attaching it for your
convenience)?
BTW, how this patch works when two mc are running? If I search in 1st mc,
then in 2nd mc, and then again in 1st mc, what will I get - last text from
1st
20 matches
Mail list logo
