On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Jindrich Novy wrote:
>
>> 2006-09-04 Jindrich Novy
>>
>>* spec.syntax: Highlight Requires(phase): correctly.
>
> The patch does more than that. I guess that if I commit that someone
> would start complaining about it... So, I
Hi Leonard,
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 13:11 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hi Jindrich,
>
> On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 15:53 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> > 2006-09-04 Jindrich Novy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * spec.syntax: Highlight Requires(phase): correctly.
>
> s/phase/phrase
Nop
Hi Jindrich,
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 15:53 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> 2006-09-04 Jindrich Novy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * spec.syntax: Highlight Requires(phase): correctly.
s/phase/phrase
The patch itself is somewhat inexact, but the same thing is done for
"Summary" so it should be fi
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> 2006-09-04 Jindrich Novy
>
>* spec.syntax: Highlight Requires(phase): correctly.
The patch does more than that. I guess that if I commit that someone
would start complaining about it... So, I will for two more days
and commit after that.
_
Hi Pavel,
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 16:38 +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Sep 2006, Jindrich Novy wrote:
>
> > the current spec.syntax incorrectly highlights these spec tags:
> >
> > Requires(pre):
> > Requires(post):
> > Requires(preun):
> > Requires(postun):
> >
> > because it doesn't assume
On Sat, 2 Sep 2006, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> the current spec.syntax incorrectly highlights these spec tags:
>
> Requires(pre):
> Requires(post):
> Requires(preun):
> Requires(postun):
>
> because it doesn't assume the Requires can be specified for pre, post,
> etc. installation phases.
Please, sub
Hi all,
the current spec.syntax incorrectly highlights these spec tags:
Requires(pre):
Requires(post):
Requires(preun):
Requires(postun):
because it doesn't assume the Requires can be specified for pre, post,
etc. installation phases.
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://peopl
