Re: New syntax highlight files, please add it to the distro

2005-03-16 Thread Mike V. Gorchak
Hello, Oswald! OB> oh, sure it "works". with my variable ah in gas being highlighted, etc. OB> just as useful as "new" and "class", etc. all over my c sources. That's bad style :) Write hundred times "Do not name variables as registers names". The same as in linux 2.4.x kernels was numerous va

Re: New syntax highlight files, please add it to the distro

2005-03-16 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 07:29:27AM +0200, Mike V. Gorchak wrote: > It's works fine for me with GAS, NASM and TASM. > oh, sure it "works". with my variable ah in gas being highlighted, etc. just as useful as "new" and "class", etc. all over my c sources. > And how you planning to split NASM sources

Re: New syntax highlight files, please add it to the distro

2005-03-16 Thread Mike V. Gorchak
Hello, Oswald! OB> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 07:45:45AM +0200, Mike V. Gorchak wrote: ??>> because assembler keywords different in the each product (WASM, MASM, ??>> TASM, GAS, NASM, etc) and I have tryied to add as much as possible ??>> keywords, OB> i'm strictly against putting all the asm sy

Re: New syntax highlight files, please add it to the distro

2005-03-16 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 07:45:45AM +0200, Mike V. Gorchak wrote: > because assembler keywords different in the each product (WASM, MASM, > TASM, GAS, NASM, etc) and I have tryied to add as much as possible > keywords, > i'm strictly against putting all the asm syntaxes in one file. it is annoying e

New syntax highlight files, please add it to the distro

2005-03-16 Thread Mike V. Gorchak
Hello all !   I've did x86 assembler syntax file for highlighting (I can't believe that I'm first who did it :-| ) and POVRay syntax highlight. Both syntax files are complete near 80%, because assembler keywords different in the each product (WASM, MASM, TASM, GAS, NASM, etc) and I have tryie