Re: Restoring the functionality of Alt-o

2005-01-31 Thread Pavel Shirshov (pchel)
Hello Miguel, Sunday, January 30, 2005, 9:40:03 AM, you wrote: MdI> A long time ago I added Alt-o as a binding that would help in MdI> navigating directories. The idea is that in one panel you press Alt-o, MdI> and if the selection is on a directory, it will load the contents of the MdI> hig

Re: Restoring the functionality of Alt-o

2005-01-31 Thread Andrew V. Samoilov
Hello Miguel, Pavel > Sunday, January 30, 2005, 9:40:03 AM, you wrote: > > MdI> A long time ago I added Alt-o as a binding that would help in > MdI> navigating directories. The idea is that in one panel you press Alt-o, > MdI> and if the selection is on a directory, it will load the contents

Re: Debian security advisory

2005-01-31 Thread Andrew V. Samoilov
Hi Leonard, > On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 14:57, Roland Illig wrote: > > My question is: How can we get the details of the vulnerabilities? A > > statement like "mc contains buffer overflows" doesn't help me. I know > > that myself. But where is it? Knowing the particular file or a use case > > would

Re: Restoring the functionality of Alt-o

2005-01-31 Thread Jindrich Novy
Hello Miguel, On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 23:40 -0500, Miguel de Icaza wrote: > Hello, > > A long time ago I added Alt-o as a binding that would help in > navigating directories. The idea is that in one panel you press Alt-o, > and if the selection is on a directory, it will load the contents of t

Re: Restoring the functionality of Alt-o

2005-01-31 Thread buc
Pavel Shirshov (pchel) wrote: Hello Miguel, Sunday, January 30, 2005, 9:40:03 AM, you wrote: MdI> A long time ago I added Alt-o as a binding that would help in MdI> navigating directories. The idea is that in one panel you press Alt-o, MdI> and if the selection is on a directory, it will load

Re: Restoring the functionality of Alt-o

2005-01-31 Thread buc
Jindrich Novy wrote: Let me propose some possibilities: 1) Revert Alt-o -> annoyed users because Alt-o suddenly changes. 2) Create an alternate keyboard shortcut such as Alt-i that acts like the old Alt-o. 3) Keep Alt-o shortcut and switch between old/new Alt-o in Options/Configuration. Personally

Re: Restoring the functionality of Alt-o

2005-01-31 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 03:11:37PM +0300, buc wrote: > Jindrich Novy wrote: > >Let me propose some possibilities: > > > >1) Revert Alt-o -> annoyed users because Alt-o suddenly changes. > > definitely. i never used the old alt-o, but i'm sort of addicted to the new one. > >2) Create an alternate k

Re: Restoring the functionality of Alt-o

2005-01-31 Thread Pavel Tsekov
Hello, On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Jindrich Novy wrote: > 2) Create an alternate keyboard shortcut such as Alt-i that acts like > the old Alt-o. > > 3) Keep Alt-o shortcut and switch between old/new Alt-o in > Options/Configuration. > > Personally I vote for 2) because mc won't lose any of its functiona

Re: Restoring the functionality of Alt-o

2005-01-31 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, > >Let me propose some possibilities: > > > >1) Revert Alt-o -> annoyed users because Alt-o suddenly changes. > > > >2) Create an alternate keyboard shortcut such as Alt-i that acts like > >the old Alt-o. > > > >3) Keep Alt-o shortcut and switch between old/new Alt-o in > >Options/Configura

More smbfs clean-ups

2005-01-31 Thread Andrew V. Samoilov
Hello, Pavel! This patch comments some more unused samba code. -- Regards, Andrew V. Samoilov GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM BCS! http://www.bcs.zp.ua Join BCS today! For your FREE webmail, visit: http://email.zp.ua/ vfs/ChangeLog:

Re: start time

2005-01-31 Thread Andrew V. Samoilov
Hello, Miguel, I am glad to see you here again. > > > > I have applied this patch to the CVS repository with a few changes > > > (configure.in checks, plus made sure that the style matched the rest of > > > the code). I think this patch is reasonable. BTW, I did not add ChangeLog entries for the

Re: Debian security advisory

2005-01-31 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Andrew, On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 09:20, Andrew V. Samoilov wrote: > > Yup. Andrew, could you please also post these patches for CAN > > vulnerabilities here? That would come in handy :) . > > Well, all of these are backports from our CVS. > It seems it was noticed in the description. Sure, I am

Re: start time

2005-01-31 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hey, > > > > I have applied this patch to the CVS repository with a few changes > > > > (configure.in checks, plus made sure that the style matched the rest of > > > > the code). > > I think this patch is reasonable. > > BTW, I did not add ChangeLog entries for these getgrouplist() patches. Thi