Re: [PING] was Re: [PATCH] Dynamically load XOpenDisplay, XQueryPointer and XCloseDisplay (2nd try)

2003-02-23 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 12:29:10AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: Hello! I just looked at your patch, and it looks good, but it needs testing with both glib-1.2 and glib-2.0, which would take some time. JFYI, I've tested the patch with both versions. On Cygwin, OpenBSD and Solaris I

Re: [PING] was Re: [PATCH] Dynamically load XOpenDisplay,XQueryPointer and XCloseDisplay (2nd try)

2003-02-23 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! Now -lext2fs should follow. I guess it is used way less than -lX11... Yes. And gpm too. Dependency on gpm is bad in particular, because it makes mc depend on S-Lang and ncurses (through libgpm) in the same time. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin ___

Re: [PING] was Re: [PATCH] Dynamically load XOpenDisplay,XQueryPointer and XCloseDisplay (2nd try)

2003-02-20 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! Is there any chance that this patch will be reviewed anytime soon ? Is there anything I can do to speed up the process ? Please, let me know. I don't want to rush anyone - simple yes, it will be reviewed, but not now will suffice. I'm trying to review the patches in the order in which

[PATCH] Dynamically load XOpenDisplay, XQueryPointer and XCloseDisplay(2nd try)

2003-02-14 Thread Pavel Tsekov
Hello, I've updated the patch a bit. The previous one would update GLIB_CFLAGS and GLIB_LIBS no matter if the gmodule functionality is necessary or not. An example for this behaviour is MC configured with --without-x, although no dynamic loading is required in this scenario one would end up