On 10/06/2010 14:17, Janne Karhunen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Greg KH gre...@suse.de wrote:
MeeGo security architecture will be base on Maemo6 (Harmattan) model
and codebase. More details about that:
http://fosdem.org/2010/schedule/events/maemo
Nokia is open sourcing the
Reshetova
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] Security architecture
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Greg KH gre...@suse.de wrote:
MeeGo security architecture will be base on Maemo6 (Harmattan) model
and codebase. More details about that:
http://fosdem.org/2010/schedule/events/maemo
Nokia is open sourcing
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Mats BERGSTROM
mats.m.bergst...@stericsson.com wrote:
Hi,
I totally appreciate your battle not being a stranger to them myself :*
However, are you able to guesstimate an ETA?
Come over to OLS and/or Security summit. This will be
presented properly in
Hi,
On 09/06/10 22:38, Thiago Macieira wrote:
FYI, a number of patches were posted to the D-Bus mailing list a
couple of days ago.
As expected, the mailing list's reaction was use PolKit...
I wonder, why was it expected ?
Looking through the dbus archive, the mailing list reaction to the
Em Quinta-feira 10 Junho 2010, às 12:59:13, Tomas Frydrych escreveu:
As expected, the mailing list's reaction was use PolKit...
I wonder, why was it expected ?
Well, it was expected to me. A few months ago, I was contacted about some
questions on modifying D-Bus, which looked like a
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Greg KH gre...@suse.de wrote:
MeeGo security architecture will be base on Maemo6 (Harmattan) model
and codebase. More details about that:
http://fosdem.org/2010/schedule/events/maemo
Nokia is open sourcing the security componets starting now.
now? Cool,
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Shaz shazal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Janne Karhunen
janne.karhu...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Greg KH gre...@suse.de wrote:
MeeGo security architecture will be base on Maemo6 (Harmattan) model
and
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Shaz shazal...@gmail.com wrote:
Effective bits in access control are quite simple and similar to
SMACK. Check the linux-security-module discussion for starters.
The 'real' difference between smack and this is that we support
multiple task labels and the fact
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Thiago Macieira thi...@kde.org wrote:
FYI, a number of patches were posted to the D-Bus mailing list a couple of
days ago.
As expected, the mailing list's reaction was use PolKit...
Duh, that was just Pekka going solo and nothing more serious
than that..
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Janne Karhunen janne.karhu...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Shaz shazal...@gmail.com wrote:
Effective bits in access control are quite simple and similar to
SMACK. Check the linux-security-module discussion for starters.
The 'real'
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Shaz shazal...@gmail.com wrote:
Effective bits in access control are quite simple and similar to
SMACK. Check the linux-security-module discussion for starters.
The 'real' difference between smack and this is that we support
multiple task labels and the
Task can hold tokens named 'Calendar' and 'Phonebook' for
accessing these interfaces. Or, we can drop this even
lower by saying Calendar::function and everything else is
not granted for.
This is where dbus comes in ... right? And now I am loosing what LSM and
rbac does here :)
Do you
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Shaz shazal...@gmail.com wrote:
Task can hold tokens named 'Calendar' and 'Phonebook' for
accessing these interfaces. Or, we can drop this even
lower by saying Calendar::function and everything else is
not granted for.
This is where dbus comes in ... right?
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Janne Karhunen janne.karhu...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Shaz shazal...@gmail.com wrote:
Task can hold tokens named 'Calendar' and 'Phonebook' for
accessing these interfaces. Or, we can drop this even
lower by saying
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Elena Reshetova elena.reshet...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Let me try to answer some questions.
How can we fit this in TCG MPWG and OMTP TR0/1 specs?
I prefer to speak about the needed properties/features, rather than about
particular specs unless there is a
On 6/10/10 12:04 PM, Shaz shazal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Janne Karhunen janne.karhu...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Shaz shazal...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you have in mind a particular use case and risks you wish to protect
against? I can take
We also need to take into account that this solution needs to work on
non-ARM hardware. ;-)
Ryan
On 6/10/10 9:56 AM, Shaz shazal...@gmail.com wrote:
Secondly, I do agree that EVM is not very suitable for trustzone but what is
more suitable? In my opinion a single file protected by
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Ware, Ryan R ryan.r.w...@intel.comwrote:
We also need to take into account that this solution needs to work on
non-ARM hardware. ;-)
Non ARM is much more easy because we will be dealing with TPM chip and TXT.
Does atom based boards come with TPM. If yes I
Dear all,
I work on security engineering of client side and I am interested to know
what the developments are at meego community. It would be a pleasure if I
can contribute. I was told to contact Ryan who leads the security team but I
have no idea how to ping him therefore addressing the
On 06/09/10 22:11, ext Shaz wrote:
Dear all,
I work on security engineering of client side and I am interested to
know what the developments are at meego community. It would be a
pleasure if I can contribute. I was told to contact Ryan who leads the
security team but I have no idea how to ping
Em Quarta-feira 9. Junho 2010, às 22.55.32, Poussa Sakari escreveu:
Nokia is open sourcing the security componets starting now. It includes
kernel modules, userspace libs, D-Bus patches, API documentation, etc. The
plan is to start integrating that to MeeGo during summer time. This of
course
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 11:55:32PM +0300, Poussa Sakari wrote:
On 06/09/10 22:11, ext Shaz wrote:
Dear all,
I work on security engineering of client side and I am interested to
know what the developments are at meego community. It would be a
pleasure if I can contribute. I was told to
22 matches
Mail list logo
