Martin, yes implicitly that would be the case. I am generally testing and targeting last Nemo VM x86 image, so I can use X11 and Qt4.8 (hopefully there will be further image releases?!). Sailfish Qt Creator and MerSDK work perfectly for me, but they have no Qt4 components. That is why I wanted the advice, whether there are generally any objections in adding repos of Nemo into this MerSDK so I can build against 4.8 with Sailfish Qt Creator / MerSDK (easy building rpms and testing/deployment) and still work with Nemo VM as test environment.
cheers simon :-) On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Martin Kampas <martin.kam...@tieto.com>wrote: > Hi, > > > > > [...] using X11Embed > > > > in Wayland environment? > > > > If I understand you correctly it is not Qt5 what prevents you to use X11, > but the fact that there is no X11 running on the device. > > > > BR, > > Martin > > > > On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 06:23:42 PM Simon Bolek wrote: > > > Thank you, I would love to use Qt5, however it has no possibility to > > > compile apps with X11 which I than need to embedd into another app using > > > X11Embedd. > > > > > > cheers > > > simon :-) > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Daniil Ivanov <daniil.iva...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > > > > > Most likely an alternative is to use Qt5. > > > > > > > > Thanks, Daniil > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Simon Bolek < > simon.bo...@googlemail.com>wrote: > > > >> hello troops ;) > > > >> > > > >> what would you advise me to do? Sailfish released MerSDK against which > > > >> building RPM packages via QtCreator and testing them in VirtualBox is > > > >> easy > > > >> now and straight forward. However there are no qt4 components in this > > > >> Sailfish MerSDK(only Qt5). > > > >> So would you just add Nemo repos to this MerSDK to zypper Qt4 > components > > > >> or would you not advise that for some reason? And than what would be > the > > > >> alternative? > > > >> > > > >> cheers > > > >> simon:) > > >
