M14776187 stage 1 complete ---transformations --- time
starting stage 1 GCD
stage 1 GCD complete
ERROR: factor doesn't divide N!
contacting server
etc.
The help file says this bug was fixed with version 20.5 concerning P-1 or ECM.
Dieter Schmitt
The Internet PrimeNet Server shows an entry 'Prime, VERIFIED' again and small
exponents appeared too.
Dieter Schmitt
_
Unsubscribe list info -- http://www.ndatech.com/mersenne/signup.htm
Mersenne Prime FAQ -- http
within ranges meant for testing, doublechecking or factoring. Maybe the
server code has been changed.
Mersenne primes already verified should be ignored by the server too :-)
Have fun
Dieter Schmitt
_
Unsubscribe list
Hi Jeff,
What was the expected completion date of that person's assigned
number? (i.e. does that cross-check also hold up, raising the confidence
level?)
Yes, it does. Completed almost two days earlier than expected, I think
that's ok too.
(Please don't post the number itself here if
possibilities (IPS account ID) against hrf5.txt for Who
@GIMPS and searching GIMPS HomePage (Top Producers/expanded version/Who
leaves only one entry matching the second condition (exponents tested = 3)
:-)
Of course, the new prime exponent may have been assigned after Nov., 1
..
Yours,
Dieter
Gareth Randell wrote:
Some SMT news that I know of:
Alpha EV8 will have SMT with 4 simultaneous execution paths.
Alpha recently got canned by compaq, so the above may never happen.
. and Intel bought Alpha from Compaq recently.
Yours,
Dieter Schmitt
Hello,
sinceseveralweeks PrimeNet doesn't assign (or
reassign?) all exponents for factoring. Between 13,4 M and 16,3 M there are
already 2,240 exponents left unassigned.
May be IPSneeds some tweaking?
Dieter Schmitt
Hi Achim,
have a look a the available exponents for double
checking.
George has made several thousend new exponents
available. Maybe the new exponents hadn't been double checked before
orprevious double checking results didn't match.Therefore he had to
do a 'small synchronization' at some
% of the local average of 310
P-90 h/day. Thus divide the local average of 310 by 0,587 and use the result
which is very near to the already known performance of 528 P-90 h/day.
Does anybody know a pretty formula of this algorithm? Why does it work at
all?
Have fun
Dieter Schmitt
-Ursprngliche Nachricht
Hi all,
I'm running Prime95 on a PII-400 for 6 days (no
overclocking) at exponent 9409271. It's produced several outputs concerning
ROUND OFF ERRORS - the last one is ROUND OFF [0.5] 0.4
What to do now? Restart from iteration
1?
Regards
Dieter Schmitt
10 matches
Mail list logo
