At 11:28 AM 4/2/2002 +0200, Henk Stokhorst wrote:
Does this signify some results have been judged invalid and need retesting?
5059 7
808945 1
100 109 2
110
At 03:13 AM 4/2/02 -0800, Aaron wrote:
I think there's always some of that when they do a database sync.
What truly puzzles me is that I *still* have exponents showing up on my
status page (thus, apparently not synchronized) going back to March of
*last* year. Again, that has always been the
Hi,
At 11:07 AM 4/2/2002 -0800, Mary K. Conner wrote:
Looking at the status report right after the synch, I could see that a
very few results from between 7.7M and 9.9M or above 16.8M were removed,
and most were left behind.
Correct. This is an artifact of our kludgy merge program written