On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 8:08 PM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 21.05.21 um 17:16 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 05:00:46PM +0200, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 4:37 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 11:46:23AM +0200, Bas
Am 21.05.21 um 17:16 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 05:00:46PM +0200, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 4:37 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 11:46:23AM +0200, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 11:10 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
---
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 01:00:54PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 19/05/2021 00:58, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > Add entry fpr i915 new parallel submission uAPI plan.
> >
> > v2:
> > (Daniel Vetter):
> >- Expand logical order explaination
> >- Add dummy header
> >- Only allow N
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 09:41:20PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:57:44AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >
> > On 20/05/2021 10:54, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 7:19 PM Matthew Brost
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 01:10:04PM
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 09:44:59PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 08:10:59AM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:54:25AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 7:19 PM Matthew Brost
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, May 19, 2021
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 10:35:37AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 20.05.21 um 23:38 schrieb Jason Ekstrand:
> > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 10:46 AM Matthew Brost
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 01:11:59PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> > > > Am 19.05.21 um 18:51 schrieb Matthew Brost:
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 05:00:46PM +0200, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 4:37 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 11:46:23AM +0200, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 11:10 AM Daniel Vetter
> > > wrote:
> > > > ---
> > > >
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 4:37 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 11:46:23AM +0200, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 11:10 AM Daniel Vetter
> > wrote:
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c | 4 ++--
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 07:58:57AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 2:10 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > - msm is mildly entertaining. It also supports MSM_SUBMIT_NO_IMPLICIT,
> > but because it doesn't use the drm/scheduler it handles fences from
> > the wrong context with a
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 2:10 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> - msm is mildly entertaining. It also supports MSM_SUBMIT_NO_IMPLICIT,
> but because it doesn't use the drm/scheduler it handles fences from
> the wrong context with a synchronous dma_fence_wait. See
> submit_fence_sync() leading to
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 11:46:23AM +0200, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 11:10 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > Docs for struct dma_resv are fairly clear:
> >
> > "A reservation object can have attached one exclusive fence (normally
> > associated with write operations) or N
On Friday, May 21st, 2021 at 1:49 AM, Lyude Paul wrote:
> After considering Libera and OFTC as options, the board settled on
> recommending OFTC. The primary reason for this is because OFTC is
> associated with our parent foundation SPI, and has a long and well known
> history of involvement
On 20/05/2021 20:41, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:57:44AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 20/05/2021 10:54, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 7:19 PM Matthew Brost wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 01:10:04PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at
On 19/05/2021 00:58, Matthew Brost wrote:
Add entry fpr i915 new parallel submission uAPI plan.
v2:
(Daniel Vetter):
- Expand logical order explaination
- Add dummy header
- Only allow N BBs in execbuf IOCTL
- Configure parallel submission per slot not per gem context
Cc:
Am 21.05.21 um 11:09 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
Docs for struct dma_resv are fairly clear:
"A reservation object can have attached one exclusive fence (normally
associated with write operations) or N shared fences (read
operations)."
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 11:10 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> Docs for struct dma_resv are fairly clear:
>
> "A reservation object can have attached one exclusive fence (normally
> associated with write operations) or N shared fences (read
> operations)."
>
>
Docs for struct dma_resv are fairly clear:
"A reservation object can have attached one exclusive fence (normally
associated with write operations) or N shared fences (read
operations)."
https://dri.freedesktop.org/docs/drm/driver-api/dma-buf.html#reservation-objects
Furthermore a review across
Am 20.05.21 um 23:38 schrieb Jason Ekstrand:
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 10:46 AM Matthew Brost wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 01:11:59PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Am 19.05.21 um 18:51 schrieb Matthew Brost:
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 01:45:39PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Oh, yeah we call
18 matches
Mail list logo
