Per https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103253 it's not just
MSVC. So I'd really recommend sticking to one of the standard C types:
intptr_t or int64_t.
Jose
On 13/10/17 10:41, Jose Fonseca wrote:
SSIZE_T is included on the headers. We include it in most
places, but not necessary
SSIZE_T is included on the headers. We include it in most
places, but not necessary all. It brings a lot of baggage, so I don't
recommend including it just for a ssize_t defitinion.
Instead I'd recommend replacing ssize_t in our code with plain standard
intptr_t.
If you really rather use
This is aparently because MSVC doesn't have ssize_t. How do you recommend
fixing it? I found a stack overflow comment that seems to be related here:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22265610/why-ssize-t-in-visual-studio-2010-is-defined-as-unsigned
The recommendation given in one of the
Build mesa 5788 failed
Commit b8ab78d1af by Jason Ekstrand on 10/11/2017 7:13 PM:
anv/pipeline_cache: Rework to use multialloc and blob\n\nThis gets rid of all of our hand-rolled size calculation and\nserialization code and replaces it with safe "standards"
