https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
Emil Velikov emil.l.veli...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
--- Comment #23 from Dave Witbrodt dawit...@sbcglobal.net ---
(In reply to comment #22)
But I still cannot build without attachment 91725 [details] above. The LLVM
fix referenced in this bug seems to have made it upstream (rev 202719), but
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
Dave Witbrodt dawit...@sbcglobal.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
--- Comment #22 from Tom Stellard tstel...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #21)
I am not a developer, but try to test upstream code related to my GPU
(RadeonSI) to catch problems early. It can be weeks (sometimes even months)
between
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
--- Comment #20 from Laurent carlier lordhea...@gmail.com ---
Patch increase size a lot. Linking failure is fixed when enable-shared-llvm
option isn't enabled. Something is weird somewhere
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
--- Comment #19 from Krzysztof A. Sobiecki sob...@gmail.com ---
Patch sent to mesa-dev, if included I will close this bug, for now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
Nikoli nik...@gmx.us changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nik...@gmx.us
--
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
--- Comment #18 from Krzysztof A. Sobiecki sob...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #17)
I've tested attachment 91725 [details] and it works with LLVM 3.5 (r198682)
in a clean build enviroment (LLVM packages for Debian from llvm.org/apt).
I
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
Kai k...@dev.carbon-project.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
--- Comment #14 from Aaron Watry awa...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 91751
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=91751action=edit
llvm-config patch to place system-libs on a single line
Patch modifies llvm-config to print
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
--- Comment #15 from Krzysztof A. Sobiecki sob...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 91763
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=91763action=edit
--system-libs patch without newline hack
Hack free version of patch
--
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
Krzysztof A. Sobiecki sob...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #91763|0 |1
is
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
Alexander Tsoy alexan...@tsoy.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexan...@tsoy.me
--
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
--- Comment #8 from Armin K kre...@email.com ---
llvm-config now has this parameter:
--system-libs System Libraries needed to link against LLVM components.
And on my system it outputs:
-lz -lpthread -lffi -lcurses -ldl -lm
This should
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
--- Comment #9 from Krzysztof A. Sobiecki sob...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #8)
llvm-config now has this parameter:
--system-libs System Libraries needed to link against LLVM components.
And on my system it outputs:
-lz
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
--- Comment #10 from Armin K kre...@email.com ---
Same here, but I use llvm-3.4 release. You could easily strip the new line
using sed or whatever.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
--- Comment #11 from Armin K kre...@email.com ---
llvm-config --ldflags
-L/usr/lib -lz -lpthread -lffi -lcurses -ldl -lm
There's also this command which doesn't add new line, at least not here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
--- Comment #12 from Armin K kre...@email.com ---
Oh, I'm sorry for multiple posts. Seems that I've downgraded to llvm-3.4 but I
was using 3.5 snapshot and that's why --ldflags works for me as it is - there's
no --system-libs option. You could
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
--- Comment #13 from Krzysztof A. Sobiecki sob...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 91725
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=91725action=edit
Another patch, with newline hack
llvm-config --ldflags:
-L/usr/lib/llvm-3.5/lib
Needed
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
Krzysztof A. Sobiecki sob...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sob...@gmail.com
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
Mike Lothian m...@fireburn.co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@fireburn.co.uk
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
--- Comment #6 from Mike Lothian m...@fireburn.co.uk ---
It seems that compiling mesa with --with-llvm-shared-libs when ever llvm is
used rather than just with opencl fixes the issue to (at least for me)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
--- Comment #7 from David okias Heidelberger david.heidelber...@ixit.cz ---
in ixit overlay I yesterday added configurable llvm [ncurses,tinfo]. I'm using
gcc-4.9-git, but it was same with gcc-4.8.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
David okias Heidelberger david.heidelber...@ixit.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
--- Comment #2 from Mike Lothian m...@fireburn.co.uk ---
Hi David
Try building llvm without terminfo and see if you get the same issue
On 13 Oct 2013 00:12, bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org wrote:
*Comment # 1
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
--- Comment #3 from David okias Heidelberger david.heidelber...@ixit.cz ---
--enable-terminfo=no
--enable-curses=no
it works well, after this. Thank you.
But it has still problem described in bugreport (if this two options arent
Out of interest which compiler are you using and which linker?
I'm sure I was seeing this with gcc 4.7 and ld.bfd but not on my gcc 4.8
system with ld.gold (both llvm's were compiled with the gold use flag
though)
I've not seen any issues on the gcc 4.7 system since upgrading to 4.8 still
with
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
--- Comment #4 from Mike Lothian m...@fireburn.co.uk ---
Out of interest which compiler are you using and which linker?
I'm sure I was seeing this with gcc 4.7 and ld.bfd but not on my gcc 4.8
system with ld.gold (both llvm's were compiled with
28 matches
Mail list logo
