Re: [Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [PATCH 00/16] anv: Fix our 48-bit problems

On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 22:48 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > On July 3, 2017 12:31:48 PM Andres Gomez wrote: > > > Never too late! ☺ > > > > On Fri, 2017-06-30 at 16:45 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > I know this is rather late but > > > > > > On June 26, 2017 1:15:16

Re: [Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [PATCH 00/16] anv: Fix our 48-bit problems

On July 3, 2017 12:31:48 PM Andres Gomez wrote: Never too late! ☺ On Fri, 2017-06-30 at 16:45 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote: I know this is rather late but On June 26, 2017 1:15:16 PM Andres Gomez wrote: > Jason, you CCed this whole series for

Re: [Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [PATCH 00/16] anv: Fix our 48-bit problems

Never too late! ☺ On Fri, 2017-06-30 at 16:45 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > I know this is rather late but > > On June 26, 2017 1:15:16 PM Andres Gomez wrote: > > > Jason, you CCed this whole series for stable. However: > > * Patch 1/16 already landed, but without the

Re: [Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [PATCH 00/16] anv: Fix our 48-bit problems

I know this is rather late but On June 26, 2017 1:15:16 PM Andres Gomez wrote: Jason, you CCed this whole series for stable. However: * Patch 1/16 already landed, but without the -stable tag. Should it be cherry-picked? It looks like yes. Yes * Patch 2/16 did

Re: [Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [PATCH 00/16] anv: Fix our 48-bit problems

Jason, you CCed this whole series for stable. However: * Patch 1/16 already landed, but without the -stable tag. Should it be cherry-picked? It looks like yes. * Patch 2/16 did not land. Is it in need of review or it has been superseded? * Patches 3-15/16 were already cherry-picked in the