On 20 November 2015 at 02:26, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 20.11.2015 05:53, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 19 November 2015 at 20:37, Tom Stellard wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 05:43:31PM +, Emil Velikov wrote:
Hi Tom,
Please flip the order
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 05:43:31PM +, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Please flip the order of the patches and drop the now patch 1/2 from
> the stable queue.
>
I'm confused about why I need to flip the order of the patches.
-Tom
> On 16 November 2015 at 20:03, Tom Stellard
On 19 November 2015 at 20:37, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 05:43:31PM +, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> Please flip the order of the patches and drop the now patch 1/2 from
>> the stable queue.
>>
>
> I'm confused about why I need to flip the order of
On 20.11.2015 05:53, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 19 November 2015 at 20:37, Tom Stellard wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 05:43:31PM +, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> Hi Tom,
>>>
>>> Please flip the order of the patches and drop the now patch 1/2 from
>>> the stable queue.
>>>
>>
>>
Hi Tom,
Please flip the order of the patches and drop the now patch 1/2 from
the stable queue.
On 16 November 2015 at 20:03, Tom Stellard wrote:
> The compiler has more information and is able to optimize the bits
> it sets in these registers.
>
> CC: