Hello,
Thanks for your reply.
Please find my comments below:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 2:45 PM Chris Wilson
wrote:
> Quoting andrey simiklit (2018-08-21 13:00:57)
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The bug for this issue was created:
> > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107626
>
> What about
Quoting andrey simiklit (2018-08-21 13:00:57)
> Hi all,
>
> The bug for this issue was created:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107626
What about something like
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw.c
b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw.c
index
Hi all,
Could somebody check it on CI to confirm that this patch do not add
regressions or maybe even take a look at this patch.
Regards,
Andrii.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 12:39 PM andrey simiklit
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It would be great if somebody look at this.
> I guess that this issue can
Hi all,
It would be great if somebody look at this.
I guess that this issue can affect every place where we use
'intel_batchbuffer_save_state/intel_batchbuffer_reset_to_saved' but only
when the 'brw_batch_has_aperture_space' function returns false several
times in a row.
Pay attention that the
Hi all,
The bug for this issue was created:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107626
Regards,
Andrii.
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 5:43 PM, wrote:
> From: Andrii Simiklit
>
> If we restore the 'new batch' using 'intel_batchbuffer_reset_to_saved'
> function we must restore the default
From: Andrii Simiklit
If we restore the 'new batch' using 'intel_batchbuffer_reset_to_saved'
function we must restore the default state of the batch using
'brw_new_batch' function because the 'intel_batchbuffer_flush'
function will not do it for the 'new batch' again.
At least the following
From: Andrii Simiklit
If we restore the 'new batch' using 'intel_batchbuffer_reset_to_saved'
function we must restore the default state of the batch using
'brw_new_batch' function because the 'intel_batchbuffer_flush'
function will not do it for the 'new batch' again.
At least the following
