Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák
Marek
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Gustaw Smolarczyk
> wrote:
>> 2016-07-14 22:14 GMT+02:00 Rob Clark :
>>> In d035d50 this
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Gustaw Smolarczyk wrote:
> 2016-07-14 22:14 GMT+02:00 Rob Clark :
>> In d035d50 this changed to 64b.. which I'm pretty sure was
>> unintentional. Revert it back to 32b so the entire state struct
>> is a nice round 64b
2016-07-14 22:14 GMT+02:00 Rob Clark :
> In d035d50 this changed to 64b.. which I'm pretty sure was
> unintentional. Revert it back to 32b so the entire state struct
> is a nice round 64b (cache-line size).
Actually, cache line size, at least on most x86 and ARM processors,
In d035d50 this changed to 64b.. which I'm pretty sure was
unintentional. Revert it back to 32b so the entire state struct
is a nice round 64b (cache-line size).
(Note sure that it would actually be measurable, but I did notice
that check_state() was hot in some benchmarks.)
Signed-off-by: Rob