On 28 November 2017 at 13:32, Andres Gomez wrote:
> Julien, this looks like a good candidate to nominate for inclusion in
> the 17.2 stable queue.
>
> What do you think?
>
Based on the discussion in the bugreport, we really want that in 17.2.
I've picked it up for 17.2.7,
Forgot to include mesa-stable ...
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 15:32 +0200, Andres Gomez wrote:
> Julien, this looks like a good candidate to nominate for inclusion in
> the 17.2 stable queue.
>
> What do you think?
>
> On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 15:31 +0100, Julien Isorce wrote:
> > The picture_is was
Julien, this looks like a good candidate to nominate for inclusion in
the 17.2 stable queue.
What do you think?
On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 15:31 +0100, Julien Isorce wrote:
> The picture_is was assumed to be a frame number so in 0-31.
> But the vaapi client gstreamer-vaapi uses the surfaces handles
>
urniss; Koenig, Christian;
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] st/va: change frame_idx from array to hash table
Boyuan, gentle ping ?
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/m
stian; Julien Isorce;
>> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org; Zhang, Boyuan
>> Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] st/va: change frame_idx from array to
>> hash table
>>
>>
>>
>> On 07/25/2017 06:04 PM, Andy Furniss wrote:
>>
>>> Christian König wrote:
>
m: Liu, Leo
Sent: July-26-17 12:01 PM
To: Andy Furniss; Koenig, Christian; Julien Isorce;
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org; Zhang, Boyuan
Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] st/va: change frame_idx from array to hash table
On 07/25/2017 06:04 PM, Andy Furniss wrote:
Christian König wrote:
Leo and Boyu
: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] st/va: change frame_idx from array to hash table
On 07/25/2017 06:04 PM, Andy Furniss wrote:
> Christian König wrote:
>
>> Leo and Boyuan can you take a quick look as well? On first glance
>> looks totally sane to me.
>
> This reminds me .
On 07/25/2017 06:04 PM, Andy Furniss wrote:
Christian König wrote:
Leo and Boyuan can you take a quick look as well? On first glance
looks totally sane to me.
This reminds me .
I don't know what's special about my setup, but I haven't been able to
use gst + vce properly since March.
Christian König wrote:
Leo and Boyuan can you take a quick look as well? On first glance looks
totally sane to me.
This reminds me .
I don't know what's special about my setup, but I haven't been able to
use gst + vce properly since March.
As I said at the time -
Am 25.07.2017 um 16:31 schrieb Julien Isorce:
The picture_is was assumed to be a frame number so in 0-31.
Typo in the commit message, that should read "picture_id", not "picture_is".
But the vaapi client gstreamer-vaapi uses the surfaces handles
as identifier which are unsigned int.
This
The picture_is was assumed to be a frame number so in 0-31.
But the vaapi client gstreamer-vaapi uses the surfaces handles
as identifier which are unsigned int.
This bug can happen when using a lot of vaapi surfaces within
the same process. Indeed Mesa/st/va increments a counter for the
surface
11 matches
Mail list logo