On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Scott D Phillips
wrote:
> Matt Turner writes:
>> These vaguely corresponded to the hardware encodings, but that is purely
>> historical at this point. Reorder them so we stop making things "almost
>> work" when
Matt Turner writes:
> These vaguely corresponded to the hardware encodings, but that is purely
> historical at this point. Reorder them so we stop making things "almost
> work" when mixing enums.
>
> The ordering has been closen so that no enum value is the same as a
>
These vaguely corresponded to the hardware encodings, but that is purely
historical at this point. Reorder them so we stop making things "almost
work" when mixing enums.
The ordering has been closen so that no enum value is the same as a
compatible hardware encoding.
---