On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Oded Gabbay wrote:
>>> After further testing, it appears there is no need for
>>>
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:03 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 26.02.2016 06:09, Oded Gabbay wrote:
>> After further testing, it appears there is no need for
>> separate BE path in r600_translate_colorswap()
>>
>> The only fix remaining is the change of the last if statement, in
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Oded Gabbay wrote:
>> After further testing, it appears there is no need for
>> separate BE path in r600_translate_colorswap()
>>
>> The only fix remaining is the
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> After further testing, it appears there is no need for
> separate BE path in r600_translate_colorswap()
>
> The only fix remaining is the change of the last if statement, in the 4
> channels case. Originally, it
On 26.02.2016 06:09, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> After further testing, it appears there is no need for
> separate BE path in r600_translate_colorswap()
>
> The only fix remaining is the change of the last if statement, in the 4
> channels case. Originally, it contained an invalid swizzle configuration
After further testing, it appears there is no need for
separate BE path in r600_translate_colorswap()
The only fix remaining is the change of the last if statement, in the 4
channels case. Originally, it contained an invalid swizzle configuration
that never got hit, in LE or BE. So the fix is