On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Ben Widawsky benjamin.widaw...@intel.com
wrote:
NOTE: The commit message is retained for posterity, however there were some
changes in the code since the patch was originally written that may make
the old
commit message false. Starting with v4 is actually much
NOTE: The commit message is retained for posterity, however there were some
changes in the code since the patch was originally written that may make the old
commit message false. Starting with v4 is actually much simpler than the
original change.
This patch is needed to help keep some of the
Ben Widawsky benjamin.widaw...@intel.com writes:
This patch actually addresses two potential issues:
1. As far as I can tell, drm_intel_gem_bo_alloc_tiled() which is invariably
called, can potentially change the tiling type. Therefore, we shouldn't be
checking the requested tiling type, but
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Ben Widawsky
benjamin.widaw...@intel.com wrote:
IMHO, intel_miptree_choose_tiling() is an unfortunate incarnation because it
conflates what is permitted vs. what is desirable. This makes doing any sort
of
fallback operations after the fact somewhat kludgey.
IMHO, intel_miptree_choose_tiling() is an unfortunate incarnation because it
conflates what is permitted vs. what is desirable. This makes doing any sort of
fallback operations after the fact somewhat kludgey.
The original code basically says:
if we requested x XOR y-tiled, and the region
