Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/6] i965: Make Gen4-5 SF_STATE use the point size calculations from Gen6+.

2017-07-04 Thread Kenneth Graunke
On Monday, July 3, 2017 1:06:04 PM PDT Andres Gomez wrote: > It looks like we could want this whole series into -stable (?) I probably wouldn't bother - it's a lot of churn, and isn't really known to fix any real applications...in fact not even test cases. Thanks for asking, though! --Ken

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/6] i965: Make Gen4-5 SF_STATE use the point size calculations from Gen6+.

2017-07-03 Thread Andres Gomez
It looks like we could want this whole series into -stable (?) On Wed, 2017-05-10 at 11:47 -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > Apparently, Nanhai made the Gen4-5 point size calculations round to the > nearest integer in commit 8d5231a3582e4f2769ac0685cf0174e09750700e, > "according to spec". When

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/6] i965: Make Gen4-5 SF_STATE use the point size calculations from Gen6+.

2017-06-05 Thread Rafael Antognolli
Reviewed-by: Rafael Antognolli On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 11:47:25AM -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > Apparently, Nanhai made the Gen4-5 point size calculations round to the > nearest integer in commit 8d5231a3582e4f2769ac0685cf0174e09750700e, > "according to spec".

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/6] i965: Make Gen4-5 SF_STATE use the point size calculations from Gen6+.

2017-05-10 Thread Kenneth Graunke
Apparently, Nanhai made the Gen4-5 point size calculations round to the nearest integer in commit 8d5231a3582e4f2769ac0685cf0174e09750700e, "according to spec". When Eric first ported the driver to Sandybridge, he did not implement this rounding. In the GL 2.1 and 3.0 specs "Basic Point