On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Siavash Eliasi siavashser...@gmail.comwrote:
Now I understand why _mesa_realloc is not appropriate to use here. From
spec:
glBufferData creates a new data store for the buffer object currently
bound to target. Any pre-existing data store is deleted. The new
Fixed memory leak, thanks for the heads up!
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2013-November/049178.html
Best Regards,
Siavash Eliasi.
On 11/26/2013 01:14 AM, Aaron Watry wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Siavash Eliasi
siavashser...@gmail.com wrote:
---
Now I understand why _mesa_realloc is not appropriate to use here. From
spec:
glBufferData creates a new data store for the buffer object currently
bound to target. Any pre-existing data store is deleted. The new data
store is created with the specified size in bytes and usage.
If data is
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Siavash Eliasi
siavashser...@gmail.com wrote:
---
src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c b/src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c
index b27f592..5581a5d 100644
---
Yes I think you are right, I guess *_mesa_align_realloc* is the correct
function which should be used here.
What do you think Ian?
Best regards,
Siavash Eliasi.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
---
src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c b/src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c
index b27f592..5581a5d 100644
--- a/src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c
+++ b/src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c
@@ -416,9 +416,9 @@ _mesa_buffer_data( struct
