On 15 June 2017 at 13:55, Andres Gomez wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-05-15 at 11:56 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 13 May 2017 at 01:11, Andres Gomez wrote:
>> > We were not considering as multiple fixes lines with:
>> > Fixes: $sha_1, Fixes: $sha_2
>> >
>> > Now,
On Mon, 2017-05-15 at 11:56 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 13 May 2017 at 01:11, Andres Gomez wrote:
> > We were not considering as multiple fixes lines with:
> > Fixes: $sha_1, Fixes: $sha_2
> >
> > Now, we split the lines so we will consider them individually, as in:
> >
On 13 May 2017 at 01:11, Andres Gomez wrote:
> We were not considering as multiple fixes lines with:
> Fixes: $sha_1, Fixes: $sha_2
>
> Now, we split the lines so we will consider them individually, as in:
> Fixes: $sha_1,
> Fixes: $sha_2
>
> Additionally, we try to get the SHA
We were not considering as multiple fixes lines with:
Fixes: $sha_1, Fixes: $sha_2
Now, we split the lines so we will consider them individually, as in:
Fixes: $sha_1,
Fixes: $sha_2
Additionally, we try to get the SHA from split lines so:
Fixes:
$sha_1
Will be considered as:
Fixes: $sha_1