On 8 August 2017 at 19:42, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 19:11 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 2 August 2017 at 21:24, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> > The device extension string is expected to contain the name of the
>> > extension defining what kind of
On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 19:11 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 2 August 2017 at 21:24, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > The device extension string is expected to contain the name of the
> > extension defining what kind of device it is, so the caller can know
> > what kinds of operations it
On 2 August 2017 at 21:24, Adam Jackson wrote:
> The device extension string is expected to contain the name of the
> extension defining what kind of device it is, so the caller can know
> what kinds of operations it can perform with it. So that string had
> better be non-empty,
The device extension string is expected to contain the name of the
extension defining what kind of device it is, so the caller can know
what kinds of operations it can perform with it. So that string had
better be non-empty, hence this trivial extension.
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson