From: Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haeh...@amd.com>
As documented in the comment, AMD GPUPerfStudio unfortunately hardcodes the
order of performance counter groups. Let's do the pragmatic thing and present
the same order as Catalyst/Crimson.
---
src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_perfcounter.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_perfcounter.c
b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_perfcounter.c
index 7ee1dae..b658866 100644
--- a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_perfcounter.c
+++ b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_perfcounter.c
@@ -311,53 +311,59 @@ static struct si_pc_block_base cik_WD = {
/* Both the number of instances and selectors varies between chips of the same
* class. We only differentiate by class here and simply expose the maximum
* number over all chips in a class.
+ *
+ * Unfortunately, GPUPerfStudio uses the order of performance counter groups
+ * blindly once it believes it has identified the hardware, so the order of
+ * blocks here matters.
*/
static struct si_pc_block groups_CIK[] = {
{ &cik_CB, 226, 4 },
- { &cik_CPC, 22 },
{ &cik_CPF, 17 },
- { &cik_CPG, 46 },
{ &cik_DB, 257, 4 },
- { &cik_GDS, 121 },
{ &cik_GRBM, 34 },
{ &cik_GRBMSE, 15 },
- { &cik_IA, 22 },
- { &cik_PA_SC, 395 },
{ &cik_PA_SU, 153 },
+ { &cik_PA_SC, 395 },
{ &cik_SPI, 186 },
{ &cik_SQ, 252 },
{ &cik_SX, 32 },
{ &cik_TA, 111, 11 },
{ &cik_TCA, 39, 2 },
{ &cik_TCC, 160, 16 },
- { &cik_TCP, 154, 11 },
{ &cik_TD, 55, 11 },
+ { &cik_TCP, 154, 11 },
+ { &cik_GDS, 121 },
{ &cik_VGT, 140 },
+ { &cik_IA, 22 },
{ &cik_WD, 22 },
+ { &cik_CPG, 46 },
+ { &cik_CPC, 22 },
+
};
static struct si_pc_block groups_VI[] = {
{ &cik_CB, 396, 4 },
- { &cik_CPC, 24 },
{ &cik_CPF, 19 },
- { &cik_CPG, 48 },
{ &cik_DB, 257, 4 },
- { &cik_GDS, 121 },
{ &cik_GRBM, 34 },
{ &cik_GRBMSE, 15 },
- { &cik_IA, 24 },
- { &cik_PA_SC, 397 },
{ &cik_PA_SU, 153 },
+ { &cik_PA_SC, 397 },
{ &cik_SPI, 197 },
{ &cik_SQ, 273 },
{ &cik_SX, 34 },
{ &cik_TA, 119, 16 },
{ &cik_TCA, 35, 2 },
{ &cik_TCC, 192, 16 },
- { &cik_TCP, 180, 16 },
{ &cik_TD, 55, 16 },
+ { &cik_TCP, 180, 16 },
+ { &cik_GDS, 121 },
{ &cik_VGT, 147 },
+ { &cik_IA, 24 },
{ &cik_WD, 37 },
+ { &cik_CPG, 48 },
+ { &cik_CPC, 24 },
+
};
static void si_pc_get_size(struct r600_perfcounter_block *group,
--
2.5.0
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
