On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 04:57:01PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 10 October 2016 at 15:37, Eric Engestrom wrote:
>
> >> > +static EGLBoolean EGLAPIENTRY
> >> > +eglSwapBuffersWithDamageKHR(EGLDisplay dpy, EGLSurface surface,
> >> > +EGLint
On 10 October 2016 at 15:37, Eric Engestrom wrote:
>> > +static EGLBoolean EGLAPIENTRY
>> > +eglSwapBuffersWithDamageKHR(EGLDisplay dpy, EGLSurface surface,
>> > +EGLint *rects, EGLint n_rects)
>> > +{
>> > + return
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 01:07:57PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 4 October 2016 at 10:30, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> > EGL_KHR_swap_buffers_with_damage is actually already supported, as it is
> > technically nothing but a rename of
Hi Eric,
On 4 October 2016 at 10:30, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> EGL_KHR_swap_buffers_with_damage is actually already supported, as it is
> technically nothing but a rename of EGL_EXT_swap_buffers_with_damage.
>
> To that effect, both extension are advertised depending on
EGL_KHR_swap_buffers_with_damage is actually already supported, as it is
technically nothing but a rename of EGL_EXT_swap_buffers_with_damage.
To that effect, both extension are advertised depending on the same
condition, and the new entrypoint simply redirects to the previous one.