On Tuesday, 2017-06-20 09:47:30 -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 06/20/2017 07:24 AM, Brian Paul wrote:
> > On 06/19/2017 03:39 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> >> On 06/19/2017 04:01 AM, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> >>> Also, make that table const, since no-one is supposed to modify it
> >>> anyway.
> >>
> >>
On 06/20/2017 07:24 AM, Brian Paul wrote:
> On 06/19/2017 03:39 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> On 06/19/2017 04:01 AM, Eric Engestrom wrote:
>>> Also, make that table const, since no-one is supposed to modify it
>>> anyway.
>>
>> I certainly like this, but I'm not sure we can use designated
>>
On Tuesday, 2017-06-20 08:24:42 -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> On 06/19/2017 03:39 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> > On 06/19/2017 04:01 AM, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> > > Also, make that table const, since no-one is supposed to modify it anyway.
> >
> > I certainly like this, but I'm not sure we can use
On 06/19/2017 03:39 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 06/19/2017 04:01 AM, Eric Engestrom wrote:
Also, make that table const, since no-one is supposed to modify it anyway.
I certainly like this, but I'm not sure we can use designated
initializers in common Mesa code due to MSVC. Brian?
They
On 19 June 2017 at 22:39, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 06/19/2017 04:01 AM, Eric Engestrom wrote:
>> Also, make that table const, since no-one is supposed to modify it anyway.
>
> I certainly like this, but I'm not sure we can use designated
> initializers in common Mesa code
On 06/19/2017 04:01 AM, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> Also, make that table const, since no-one is supposed to modify it anyway.
I certainly like this, but I'm not sure we can use designated
initializers in common Mesa code due to MSVC. Brian?
> Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom
Also, make that table const, since no-one is supposed to modify it anyway.
Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom
---
I was grepping for a field to see where it was being set, and I couldn't find
it because it was using positional struct initialisation. Ended up finding it,