On 18 April 2017 at 16:16, Andres Gomez wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 12:15 +0200, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
>> On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 19:38 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> > On 7 April 2017 at 12:30, Juan A. Suarez Romero
>> > wrote:
>> > > Both scripts
On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 12:15 +0200, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 19:38 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > On 7 April 2017 at 12:30, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> > > Both scripts does not use a file with the commits to ignore. So if we
> > > have handled
On 10 April 2017 at 11:15, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 19:38 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 7 April 2017 at 12:30, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
>> > Both scripts does not use a file with the commits to ignore. So if we
>> >
On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 19:38 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 7 April 2017 at 12:30, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> > Both scripts does not use a file with the commits to ignore. So if we
> > have handled one of the suggested commits and decided we won't pick it,
> > the
On 7 April 2017 at 12:30, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> Both scripts does not use a file with the commits to ignore. So if we
> have handled one of the suggested commits and decided we won't pick it,
> the scripts will continue suggesting them.
>
> This commits adds support
Both scripts does not use a file with the commits to ignore. So if we
have handled one of the suggested commits and decided we won't pick it,
the scripts will continue suggesting them.
This commits adds support for a bin/.cherry-ignore-extra where we can
put the commits not explicitly rejected